24. Div. Instit. v. 3.
25. Migne, Patr. Graec. xxii. pp. 797-800, ch. 2.
26. For details, and for further points in this connexion, see J.T.S. of April 1911, p. 377 et seq.
27. e.g. Apocr. iii. 30, p. 125, 1. 6, and iii. 36, p. 131, 1. 9. It is argued that such remarks are merely interpolations, but sometimes (as in iv. 19) the personal introduction gradually shades off into the words of the objection.
28. Lactantius, De Mortibus Persecutorum, xvi.
29. See e.g. Apocr. ii. 12, and the Preface to iii. for the heathen's attitude, and iii. 10 for his own.
30. Apocr. iv. 3, p. 160, l. 6, and iv. 5, p. 163, l. 4.
31. Apocr. ii. 15, p. 24.
32. Ibid. iv. 13.
33. Ibid. iv. 25 : i3na triw~n u9posta&sewn e0n ou0si/a| mia~| gnwrisqh~| to_ u2noma ; but this is not identical with the later stereotyped phrase mi/a ou0si/a e0n trisi\n u9posta&sesin .
34. For a discussion of the whole subject, see J.T.S. of July 1907, p. 553 et seq. See also below, pp. xxviii, 141, 142, and 155.
35. Apocr. iii. 9; Greg. Nyss., Or. Cat. chs. xxi.-xxvi.
36. Rufinus, Comment, in Symb. Apost. § 14.
37. Holl., Amphil. p. 91 et seq.
38. J. T.S. April and July 1907.
39. Some scholars have regarded "The Blessed Magnesian" as simply a nom deguerre, or as suggesting an anonymous author, while others have simply written of him as Magnetes.
40. He is condemned, particularly with regard to the non-eternity of punishment, of being a follower tou~ dussebou~j kai\ a0poplh&ktou 'Wrige/nouj , Nic., op. cit. ; cf. Apocr. iv. 16, p. 187, 1. 32.
41. Apocr. iii. 16, p. 96, and iii. 24, p. 108 et seq.
42. Nic., op. cit., stolh_n i9ere/wj a0mpexo&menon .
43. Lumper (ap. Migne, Patr. Lat. v. p. 343) suggests that our author was confused with the Macarius of the Oak, and "hinc fortasse sive fraude, sive ignorantia, Episcopi titulum addiderit librarius, Magnetis vetustioris opus exscribens."
44. p. xv.
45. Apocr. iii. 40, p. 138, 11. 21, 22
46. Ibid. v. 15, and iii. 43, p. 151
47. Ibid. v. 17, p. 191, I. 17
48. Ibid. ii. 8, p. 66, 1. 19.