Macarius Magnes: Apocriticus . -- Footnotes
Greek text is rendered using the Scholars Press SPIonic font, free from here .
1. tw~n a0pokritik~wn pro_j Ellhnaj lo&gwn . But the full title of the work is first given as The Apocriticus or Monogenes to the Greeks of Macarius Magnes, concerning the questions and solutions in the Gospel.
2. The full title is again first given, in somewhat different form, as The Apocriticus or Monogenes to the Greeks of Macarius Magnes, concerning the questions and answers in dispute in the New Testament.
3. Macarius replies to two questions in one answer.
4. The heading gives it thus as two separate chapters, although there is but one chapter in the text in the case of both question and answer.
5. See Nicephorus, Antirrhetici Libri, ap. Pitra, Spicilegium Solesmense, tom. i. p. 303 et seq.
6. Turrianus, Dogmaticus de Justificatione ad Germanos adversus Luteranos, Romae, 1557, p. 37 et seq.
7. See p. 166, n. 1.
8. See p. 31.
9. See F. Turrianus, Adversus Magdeburgenses, Colon. 1573, ii. 3, p. 165; i. 5, p. 21, and ii. 13, p, 208.
10. See Migne, Patr, Graec. X. p. 1343 et seq. His opinions are summarised by Pitra, Spicil. Solesm. i. p. 545.
11. Macarii Magnetis quae supersunt, ex inedito codice edidit, C. Blondel, Klincksieck, Paris, 1876. It is this which has been used in the translation which follows, and reference is occasionally made to its pages.
12. De Macario Magnete et scriptis ejus, Klincksieck, Paris, 1877.
13. Lactantius, Div. Instit. v. 2.
14. Möller, Schärers Theol. Lit. Zeit. 1877, p. 521 ; Zahn, Zeitschrift fär Kirchengeschichte, B. ii. p. 450 et seq., 1878; Wagenmann, Jahrbächer fär Deutsche Theol. B. xxii. p. 141, 1878. On such authority, Dr. Salmon simply states it as a fact in the article on Macarius in the Dict. Christ. Biog.
15. See J.T.S. of April 1907 (vol. viii. No. 31), p. 404 et seq., Macarius Magnes, a Neglected Apologist, and July 1907 (vol. viii. No, 33, p. 546 et seq.).
16. Kritik des Neues Testaments von einen griechischen Philosophen der 3 Jahrhunderts, etc. ( Texte und Untersuchungen, etc. xxxvii. 4, Leipzig, 1911).
17. J.T.S. April and July 1914 (vol. xv. Nos. 59 and 60), The work of Porphyry against the Christians, and its reconstruction.
18. Georg Schalkhausser, Zu der Schriften des Makarios von Magnesia, Leipzig, 1907.
19. Op. cit. pp. 39 and 12.
20. See p. 95, n. 2.
21. Corpus Inscript. Lat. t. 3, No. 133, ap. Duch. p. 20.
22. Apocr. iii. 1.
23. Euseb., In Hieroclem, in Gottfriedus Alearius's edition of Philostratus, Lipsiae, 1709, p. 459. a0fanisqh~nai fhsi\n au0to&n should be compared with a0fanh_j e0ge/neto of the Apocriticus.