Matthew 21 · The Lantern

The Triumphal Entry

And when they drew near to Jerusalem and came to Bethphage, on the Mount of Olives, then Jesus sent two disciples,

Whence Bethphage is interpreted, The house of the Shoulder; for the shoulder was the priest's portion in the Law...

The Evangelist related above that the Lord departed from Galilee, and began to go up to Jerusalem. Being now occupied with telling what He did by the way, he proceeds in his purpose, saying, And when they drew nigh to Jerusalem, and were come to Bethphage. Bethphage was a small village of the priests, situated on the declivity of Mount Olivet, one mile distant from Jerusalem.

The Gospel of Matthew was divided above into three parts: in the first, he presents Christ's entry into the world, up to the third chapter; secondly, his progress in the world; in the third, his departure. Having completed the first two parts, here he treats of the third.

saying to them, “Go into the village which is in front of you, and immediately you will find a donkey tied and a colt with her; having untied them, bring them to Me.

And if anyone may say anything to you, you will say that the Lord has need of them; and immediately he will send them.”

Two disciples are sent to the village to loosen the ass tied up with its colt and to bring them to him. And should someone ask them why they are doing that, they are to respond that the Lord needs the animals, which must be released to him without delay.From the previous sermons we remember that the two sons of Zebedee symbolize the double vocation of Israel.

(ap. Anselm) Or, The owner of the beasts will straightway send them to be engaged for Christ's service.

But, as the Apostle says (Titus 1:9), a bishop must have learning, that he may be able to exhort in sound doctrine: hence what he says, "loose them," pertains to doctrine; but what follows, "and if any man shall say anything to you" etc., pertains to authority.

And this has come to pass that what was spoken through the prophet might be fulfilled, saying:

(Vers. 4, 5.) However, this happened so that what was spoken through the prophet might be fulfilled, saying: Tell the daughter of Zion, behold your king comes to you, meek and sitting on a donkey, and on a colt, the foal of a beast of burden. This is written in the prophet Zechariah: of which, if there is enough time in life, it will be said in its proper place.

(ap. Anselm) Hereto is added the testimony of the Prophet, that it may be shown that the Lord fulfilled all things which were written of Him, but that the Scribes and Pharisees, blinded by envy, would not understand the things that they read; All this was done, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the Prophet; (Zech. 9:9.) to wit, Zacharias.

"Now all this was done" etc. Here the reason for the command is presented. Lest anyone believe that this was done without reason, he therefore shows the reason: "that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet" etc. This is said through Zechariah (9:9). But the word "that" is taken not causally, but consecutively.

“Say to the daughter of Zion, ‘Behold, your King comes to you, gentle and riding on a donkey, even upon a colt, the foal of a beast of burden.’”

(de Cons. Ev. ii. 66.) In this quotation from the Prophet, there is some variety in the different Gospels. Matthew quotes it as if the Prophet had expressly mentioned the she-ass; but it is not so quoted by John, nor in the Church-copies of the translation in common use.

Behold, is a word used in pointing out any thing; look, that is, not with the bodily eye, but with the spiritual understanding, at the works of His power. Also aforetimes He oft said, Behold, that He might show that He of whom He spake before He was born was even then thy King. When then ye shall see Him, say not, We have no King but Cæsar.

"Tell the daughter of Sion" etc. Announce to the daughter of Sion: this refers to the people of Jerusalem who were subject to Mount Sion. Likewise, it signifies the whole Church, because Sion is interpreted as "watchtower." "Announce his doings among the Gentiles," Ps 9:12.

And the disciples, having gone and having done even as Jesus directed them,

All of these circumstances surrounding his appearance point to the shape of the future. By means of parabolic signs and by the conditions of present things, the form of the future is here suggested. The Lord is taking possession of the nations! His brightness is approaching! He is occupying the minds of the nations—just as the rider of a beast.

Luke and Mark mention only one beast of burden, but Matthew mentions both ass and foal; yet they do not contradict. The mother followed the foal which was led. "He sat thereon," not on the two beasts, but on the clothes. Or, first He sat on the ass and later on the foal, since He first took His rest in the synagogue of the Jews and later among the people of the Gentiles.

"And the disciples going, did as Jesus commanded them." After the command has been presented, here the execution of the command is presented. And first in general: "the disciples going." Behold, the command of obedience is given. Exod 29:35: "All the things the Lord hath commanded, we will do."

brought the donkey and the colt, and put the cloaks upon them, and He sat on them.

Notwithstanding, it was possible that the Lord might have sate upon both animals. The Lord sitting upon the ass goes towards Jerusalem, because presiding over the Holy Church, or the faithful soul, He both guides it in this life, and after this life leads it to the view of the heavenly country.

Never before had the Lord employed the services of beasts, nor surrounded Himself with the ornaments of green boughs, till now when He is going up to Jerusalem to suffer. He moved them that beheld to do that which they had before desired to do; so it was opportunity that was now given them, not their purpose that was changed.

Then in particular: "and they brought the ass and the colt." By this is signified that they converted both Jews and Gentiles, as it says (Rom 1:14): "To the Greeks and to the barbarians, to the wise and to the unwise, I am a debtor." "And they laid their garments upon them." The garments are their virtues.

And the very great crowd spread their own cloaks on the road, and others were cutting down branches from the trees and were spreading them on the road.

The multitudes that came out of Jericho, and followed the Saviour, cast down their garments, and strewed the way with branches of trees; and therefore it follows, But the multitudes spread their garments in the way; that is, beneath the feet of the ass, that it should not stumble against a stone, nor tread upon a thorn, nor fall into a ditch.

In the literal account, laying down of clothing is a sign of great reverence, and the cutting of branches is a sign of festivity. But in the spiritual sense, learn that the apostles first laid down their garments, which are their virtues, and then the Lord sat upon them. For God is not conveyed by a soul that has not been adorned with apostolic virtues.

"And a very great multitude spread their garments in the way." After he has treated of the ministry of the disciples, he treats of the glory from the crowds. And first, the glory which they exhibit to him in deed; secondly, that which they exhibit in word, at "and the crowds (...) cried out." And first, they spread their garments; secondly, branches from the trees. And why?

And the crowds which are going before Him and those following were crying out, saying: “Hosanna to the Son of David! Blessed is the One coming in the name of the Lord! Hosanna in the highest!”

Or when they say, Hosanna to the Son of David; Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord, it is the dispensation of Christ's humanity that they set forth; but His restoration to the holy places when then say, Hosanna in the highest.

Indeed, on the one hand, the fact that the donkey walks on the branches and leaves of palm trees would make it clearly known that not only he who was mounted upon it but also those who would believe in him were going to subdue all their enemies, trample them under their feet and win a glorious victory. For the branches and leaves of palm trees are the emblems of the victory.

"And the multitudes that went before and that followed, cried out." Here is presented the honor exhibited to him in word. But by whom? By those going before and those following, namely, by those who were before the coming and after; and both seek salvation, and have it from Christ.

And when He was entering into Jerusalem, all the city was stirred, saying, “Who is this?”

And the crowds were saying, “This is the prophet Jesus, the One from Nazareth of Galilee.”

Jesus Cleanses the Temple

And Jesus entered into the temple and cast out all those selling and buying in the temple, and He overturned the tables of the money changers and the seats of those selling the doves.

For in that they ought neither to sell nor to buy, but to give their time to prayer, being assembled in a house of prayer, whence it follows, And he saith unto them, It is written, My house shall be called a house of prayer. (Is.

But why do we speak of these things, when we still see many burdened by more atrocious deeds? For I speak to you priests with grief, because we have learned that some of you perform ordinations for payments, selling spiritual grace and accumulating temporal gains from the iniquities of others along with the harm of sin.

"And Jesus entered into the temple of God, and cast out them that sold and bought." Above the Evangelist showed the glory which was exhibited to Christ on the way, and that in the city; now he treats of the glory in respect to those things which were done in the temple. And three things were done in the temple which pertain to the glory of Christ.

And He says to them, “It has been written: ‘My house will be called a house of prayer’; but you yourselves make it a den of robbers.”

And blind and lame came to Him in the temple, and He healed them.

But the chief priests and the scribes, having seen the wonders that He did and the children who are crying out in the temple and saying, “Hosanna to the Son of David,” were indignant

But (we hold the contrary): for Christ, by "accepting praise out of the mouth of babes and sucklings," has declared that neither childhood nor infancy is without sensibility, -the former of which states, when meeting Him with approving shouts, proved its ability to offer Him testimony; while the other, by being slaughtered, for His sake of course, knew what violence meant.

When the Pharisees saw the children offering to Christ the hymn of David which the prophet seems to offer to God (Ps. 117:26), they exploded with spite and reviled Him for allowing things of God to be said of Him.

There follows the indignation of the priests, hence he says "and when the chief priests and Scribes saw (...) they were much displeased." Of such it is said (2 Tim 3:13): "They always advance to worse." And first the reproof is presented; secondly, the inquiry; thirdly, the response. Concerning the first, three things.

and said to Him, “Do You hear what these say?” And Jesus says to them, “Yes. Did you never read that ‘Out of the mouth of babes and sucklings You have prepared for Yourself praise’?”

But the answer of Christ was cautions. He spake not what the Scribes would fain have heard, The children do well that they bear witness to me; nor on the other hand, They do what is wrong, they are but children, you ought to be indulgent to their tender years.

"And said to him: hearest thou what these say?" As if to say, it is not just that a mere man should allow himself to be praised as God.

And having left them, He went out of the city to Bethany, and He passed the night there.

For Christ's disciples pray for nothing that they ought not, and as confiding in their Master they pray only for things great and heavenly. Mystically; the Lord leaving the Chief Priests and Scribes withdrew without the earthly Jerusalem, which therefore fell.

He departs from those who were unworthy and goes to Bethany, which means "house of obedience." He goes from those who are disobedient to those who are obedient to Him, and among them He lodges. For He says, "I will dwell and walk among them" (II Cor. 6:16).

"And leaving them, he went out of the city into Bethania." Here he confutes in deed. And first, by a deed done regarding himself; secondly, by a deed done regarding the fig tree. He says therefore that "leaving them, he went out." And that leaving was a sign that they themselves would leave him.

The Barren Fig Tree

And early, as He was coming back into the city, He became hungry;

And because this plant was figuratively a living creature, having a soul, He speaks to it as though it heard. Let no fruit grow on thee henceforward for ever.

Of the many miracles which the Lord performed, all were done to do good, for He performed no miracles of chastisement. Therefore, lest anyone think that He is unable to chastise, here He shows this power as well, not applied to men but to a tree, as He loves mankind. He also did the same on a previous occasion to the swine. He withers the tree, then, in order to chasten men.

"And in the morning, returning into the city, he was hungry." Here the confutation under a certain figurative action is presented. And first, the action is presented; secondly, the wonder of the disciples. Concerning the first: first, the occasion for working the miracle is presented; secondly, the barrenness of the tree; thirdly, the curse; fourthly, the effect.

and having seen one fig tree along the road, He came to it and found nothing on it except leaves alone. And He says to it, “No more may there be fruit from you to the age.” And immediately the fig tree withered.

Herein also we find proof of the Lord's goodness; where He was minded to show forth an instance of the salvation procured by His means, He exerted the power of His might on the persons of men; by healing their present sicknesses, encouraging them to hope for the future, and to look for the healing of their soul.

(ord.) The Creator does no wrong to the owner, but His creature at His will is converted to the profit of others.

"And seeing a fig tree." But why did he work this miracle on a fig tree rather than another? Because it is a very moist tree. Hence that it immediately dried up was a most evident miracle. And it signifies Judea for two reasons: both because the fig tree produces early figs, which ripen more quickly, and these were the apostles, who were the greatest.

And the disciples, having seen it, marvelled, saying, “How did the fig tree wither so quickly?”

But if the Lord come seeking fruit with temptations, and one be found having nought of righteousness but only a profession of faith, which is leaves without fruit, he is soon withered, losing even his seeming faith; and every disciple makes this fig tree to wither, by making it be seen that he is void of Christ, as Peter said to Simon, Thy heart is not right in the sight of God…

Now in order to convey this truth the Lord acted prophetically. By this I mean that in reference to the fig tree, it was not his will merely to exhibit a miracle but rather through this sign to convey an intimation of that which was to come. He often taught and persuaded us by such means.

"And the disciples seeing it wondered." Here first the wonder is presented; secondly, the satisfaction of the wonder. He says "and the disciples seeing it wondered." Just as men wonder when they see a spirit that seems good, and it quickly withers, so they wondered how it dried up so quickly.

And Jesus, answering, said to them, “Amen I say to you, if you shall have faith and shall not doubt, not only will you do the miracle of the fig tree, but even if you shall say to this mountain, ‘Be taken away and be cast into the sea,’ it will come to pass.

And that thou mightest learn, that for their sakes this was done, that He might train them to feel confidence, hear what He saith afterwards. But what saith He? "Ye also shall do greater things, if ye are willing to believe and to be confident in prayer." Seest thou that all is done for their sake, so that they might not be afraid and tremble at plots against them?

And he avenges his exclusion from the elect by more cruel treatment of the reprobate.

"And Jesus answering" etc. Here he satisfies them. And first by showing the power of faith: hence he says "amen I say to you." Above he presented the same teaching, but here he explains it; hence he says "if you shall have faith, and stagger not;" because faith must be firm without hesitation; James 1:6: "But let him ask in faith, nothing wavering." "Not only shall you do what…

And all things, as much as you shall ask in the prayer, believing, you will receive.”

The door of the Giver is opened to the petitions of faith, even as He said, "Whatsoever ye shall ask, not being doubtful, ye shall receive." In the house of God faith giveth her commands like a mistress of wealth and a ruler of possessions.

But whenever we are not heard when we pray, it is either because we ask something adverse to the means of our salvation; or because the perverseness of those for whom we ask hinders its being granted to them; or because the performance of our request is put off to a future time, that our desires may wax stronger, and so may have more perfect capacity for the joys they seek afte…

Likewise, he touches upon the power of faith with respect to prayer: "for all things whatsoever you shall ask in prayer believing, you shall receive;" above (2:7): "Ask, and you shall receive."

Jesus’ Authority Challenged

And when He was coming into the temple, the chief priests and the elders of the people came to Him teaching, saying, “By what authority are You doing these things? And who gave You this authority?”

We have spoken, so far as our moderate ability permitted, of the generals which form the groundwork of the sanctity of baptism. I will now, equally to the best of my power, proceed to the rest of its character, touching certain minor questions.

Or in these words they urge the same cavil as above, when they said, He casteth out demons through Beelzebub the Prince of the demons. (Mat. 12:24.) For when they say, By what authority doest thou these things? they doubt concerning the power of God, and would have it understood that the things He does are of the Devil. But when they add, Who gave thee this authority?

"And when he had come." Here they reprove him by questioning. And first, the questioning is presented; secondly, the confutation, at "Jesus answering said to them." Concerning the first, two things. And first, the questions are presented; secondly, Christ's responses.

And Jesus, answering, said to them, “I myself also will ask you one thing, which if you shall tell Me, I myself also will say to you by what authority I do these things.

(Verse 24) But Jesus, answering, said to them: I will also ask you one question, which if you tell me, I will also tell you by what authority I do these things. This is what is commonly said: A bad knot of a tree, a bad nail or wedge must be driven in.

Not that they should answer it, and thereupon hear of Christ the answer to their question, but that being puzzled they should ask Him no farther; according to that precept He had given above, Give not that which is holy to the dogs. (Mat.

According to Chrysostom, when someone asks in order to learn, then the truth should be answered to him; but when he asks in order to test, then he must be reproved and confuted. So the Lord, because he knew they were testing him, said: "I will also ask you one thing."

The baptism of John, from where was it? From heaven or from men?” And they were reasoning among themselves, saying, “If we shall say, ‘From heaven,’ He will say to us, ‘Why then did you not believe in him?’

The baptism announced by John formed the subject, even at that time, of a question, proposed by the Lord Himself indeed to the Pharisees, whether that baptism were heavenly, or truly earthly: about which they were unable to give a consistent answer, inasmuch as they understood not, because they believed not.

(Verse 25) The baptism of John, whence was it? From heaven or from men? But they thought within themselves, saying: If we say, From heaven, he will say to us: Why then did you not believe him?

"The baptism of John, whence was it? From heaven, or from men?" Peter baptized, and it is not called the baptism of Peter; and John baptized, and it is called the baptism of John; because in John's baptism everything was done by man; but in Peter's baptism sins were remitted, which could not be done by man.

But if we shall say, ‘From men,’ we fear the multitude; for all hold John as a prophet.”

And how was it they did not say that the baptism was of men? "They feared the people" it is said. Seest thou a perverse heart? In every case they despise God and do all things for the sake of men.

(Verse 26) But if we say, From men, we are afraid of the multitude: for all held John as a prophet. If they had wanted to say that it was a human invention and had nothing divine, they feared the rebellion of the people. For all the crowds had received John's baptism in groups, and they held him as a prophet.

Then the responses are treated. And first, the response of the Jews; secondly, of Christ. It is true that the lesser people believed, but the Pharisees were indignant; therefore, if they said it was from men, their confusion would follow. Likewise, all held John to be a prophet; above (11:7): "What went you out into the desert to see?" etc.

And answering Jesus, they said, “We do not know.” And He Himself also was saying to them, “Neither do I myself tell you by what authority I do these things.

And answering Jesus, they said: We do not know. Therefore, the most impious faction responded and, using the word of humility by which they claimed not to know, used it to plot deceit.

There are two reasons why the knowledge of truth should be kept back from those who ask; either when he who asks is unfit to receive, or from his hatred or contempt of the truth is unworthy to have that which he asks opened to him.

"And answering they said: we know not." They lie. Ps 26:12: "Iniquity hath lied to itself." Then Christ's response is presented: "neither do I tell you." In this is contained an example, that from him who will not say what he knows, the Lord hides other things; hence Wis 7:13: "Without guile I learned, and without envy do I communicate."

The Parable of the Two Sons

But what do you think? A man had two sons; and having come to the first, he said, ‘Son, go work today in the vineyard.’

Whence we may gather, that in this parable the Lord spoke to such as promise little or nothing, but in their works shine forth; and against those who promise great things but do none of these things that they have promised.

He introduces two types of men. One type are those who promised from the beginning: such were the Jews who said, "All which God spoke, we will do and we will obey" (Ex. 24:3).

"But what think you? A certain man had two sons" etc. Above the Lord suppressed their inquiry by his own question; here he refutes the inquirers. And first concerning disobedience; secondly, concerning malice, and this according to two parables, the second of which explains and clarifies the first. Concerning the first, two things.

And he, answering, said, ‘I do not want to.’ But afterward, having repented, he went.

He answers haughtily, I will not. But when, at the coming of the Saviour, the Gentile people, having done penitence, laboured in God's vineyard, and atoned by their labour for the obstinacy of their refusal, this is what is said, But afterward he repented, and went.

For the Gentiles from the beginning leaving God and his righteousness, and going over to idols and sins, seem to make answer in their thoughts, We will not do the righteousness of God.

Then the refusal is presented. "But he answering said: I will not." This is nothing other than to despise the commands of God. Job 21:14: "The knowledge of thy ways we desire not." After this follows the fulfillment: "but afterwards, being moved with repentance, he went." Jer 31:19: "After thou didst convert me, I did penance."

And having come to the other, he said likewise. And he, answering, said, ‘I myself will, Sir,’ and he did not go.

(Verse 30) Going to the second, he said similarly. But he, answering, said: Yes, sir, and he did not go. However, the second son, who is the people of the Jews, replied to Moses: 'We will do everything that the Lord has spoken' (Exod. XXIV), but he did not go into the vineyard because, thinking himself the heir after the son of the household had been killed.

But afterwards turning their backs, they lied unto God, according to that in the Psalms, The sons of the strangers have lied unto me. (Ps. 18:44.) This is what is said, But he went not.

There follows the disobedience of the second: and first the command is presented, secondly the transgression. He says "coming to the other," that is, the Jewish people, or the clergy, or those who call themselves just; "he said in like manner.

Which of the two did the will of the father?” They say, “The first.” Jesus says to them, “Amen I say to you that the tax collectors and the prostitutes go before you into the kingdom of God.

The first son represents the people who are from the Pharisees. Urgently admonished by God through the prophecy of John to conform themselves to his commandments, they remained insolent, disobedient and contemptuous to God's warnings. They put their faith in the law and despised repentance from sin, glorying instead in the noble prerogative that they had from Abraham.

Yet the kingdom of God may be understood of the Gentiles, or of the present Church, in which the Gentiles go before the Jews, because they were more ready to believe.

Then he draws out the verdict: "which of the two did the will of his father?" The first did not promise, but he did it; the second promised, but did not do it. "Which of these did the will of his father?" They answer and say to him: "the first," because "it is better not to vow, than after a vow not to pay what was promised," Eccl 5:4.

For John came to you in the way of righteousness, and you did not believe in him; but the tax collectors and the prostitutes believed in him. And you yourselves, having seen it, did not even repent afterward, to believe him.

The Parable of the Wicked Tenants

Hear another parable. There was a man, a master of a house, who planted a vineyard and placed a fence around it, and he dug a winepress in it and built a tower, and he rented it out to farmers and traveled abroad.

He also introduces a parable of the mission to the vineyard of the Son (not the Father), who was sent after so many servants, and slain by the husbandmen, and avenged by the Father.

He hath planted a vine of which Isaiah speaks, The vine of the Lord of Hosts is the house of Israel. (Isa. 5:7.) And hedged it round about; i. e. either the wall of the city, or the guardianship of Angels. A winepress, that is to say, An altar; or those winepresses after which the three Psalms, the 8th, the 80th, and the 83d are entitled, that is to say, the martyrs.

"Hear another parable." The Lord had asked about the baptism, and they refused to answer; but now he questions covertly, so that they may not perceive; therefore he sets forth a parable, and does two things.

And when the season of the fruits drew near, he sent his servants to the farmers to receive his fruits.

And the farmers, having taken his servants, beat the one, and killed another, and stoned another.

And "He sent His servants," that is, the prophets, "to receive the fruit;" that is, their obedience, the proof of it by their works. But they even here showed their wickedness, not only by failing to give the fruit, after having enjoyed so much care, which was the sign of idleness, but also by showing anger towards them that came.

(Verse 35-36) And the vinedressers took his servants, and beat one, and killed another, and stoned another. Again, he sent other servants more than the first: and they did unto them likewise. We read the letter of Paul to the Hebrews (Heb. XI); and from it we learn in great detail the sufferings endured by the servants of the Lord.

After this the malice is treated. And first with respect to the first group; secondly, with respect to the second; thirdly, with respect to the third. "And the husbandmen laying hands on his servants, beat one," as Micaiah, "killed another," as Isaiah, "and stoned another," as Naboth. Heb 11:37: "They were stoned, they were cut asunder, they were killed by the sword."

Again he sent other servants, more than the first, and they did to them likewise.

And afterward he sent to them his son, saying, ‘They will respect my son.’

But the farmers, having seen the son, said among themselves, ‘This is the heir; come, let us kill him and let us have his inheritance.’

Or we may suppose this fulfilled in the case of those Jews who, knowing Christ, believed in Him. But what follows, But when the husbandmen saw the son, they said among themselves, This is the heir, come let us kill him, and let us seize on the inheritance, was fulfilled in those who saw Christ, and knew Him to be the Son of God, yet crucified Him.

But the husbandmen saw Him and said, "This is the heir; come, let us kill Him." The Jews, too, said, "This is the Christ," and they crucified Him. They cast Him out of the vineyard, for the Lord was slain outside of the city.

Then the purpose of malice is presented. And first, the scheming is presented; secondly, the plan; thirdly, the malice. "But the husbandmen seeing the son, said among themselves: this is the heir; come, let us kill him, and we shall have his inheritance;" for the son is truly the heir of his father, because what he asks, he obtains.

And having taken him, they cast him out of the vineyard and killed him.

Or, what He says, And cast him out of the vineyard, seems to me to be this; As far as they were concerned they judged Him a stranger both to the vineyard, and the husbandmen. When therefore the Lord of the vineyard cometh, what will he do unto those husbandmen?

(Verse 39) And they apprehended him, cast him out of the vineyard, and killed him. And the Apostle speaks, that Jesus was crucified outside the gate (Heb. 13). We can also understand it differently; that he was cast out of the vineyard, and there he was killed: so that when the gentiles received him, the vineyard would be given to others.

Then the execution is presented: "and taking him, they cast him forth out of the vineyard, and killed him," because they crucified him outside the gate of the city, and so they killed him as though a stranger to the vineyard. Isa 53:7: "He was led as a sheep to the slaughter" etc.

When therefore the master of the vineyard may come, what will he do to those farmers?”

They say to Him, “The wretches — He will destroy them grievously, and he will rent out the vineyard to other farmers who will give him the fruits in their seasons.”

Like Caiaphas (John 11:49) so did they, not from themselves, prophesy against themselves, that the oracles of God were to he taken from them, and given to the Gentiles, who could bring forth fruit in due season.

That their answer is true, comes not of any righteous judgment in them, but from the case itself; truth constrained them. Otherwise: Luke has given the answer of their lips, Matthew that of their hearts. For some made answer openly contradicting Him, and saying, God forbid, but their consciences took it up with He shall miserably destroy these wicked men.

The verdict is given: "he will bring those evil men to an evil end," i.e., to destruction in the present and in the future. And they say "evil," i.e., bitterly.

Jesus says to them: “Did you never read in the Scriptures: ‘The stone which those building rejected, this has become the head of the corner. From the Lord was this, and it is marvellous in our eyes’?

Because of this I say to you that the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and will be given to a people producing its fruits.”

By the kingdom of God, He means the mysteries of the kingdom of God, that is, the divine Scriptures, which the Lord committed, first to that former people who had the oracles of God, but secondly to the Gentiles who brought forth fruit. For the word of God is given to none but to him who brings fruit thereof, and the kingdom of God is given to none in whom sin reigns.

The kingdom of God, that is, closeness with God, has been taken from the Jews and given to those who believed.

Then he explains; and he presents two conclusions. The first is drawn from what was said in the parable; the second is taken from what was said in the scriptural text. He says therefore "therefore I say to you, that the kingdom shall be taken from you," i.e., sacred Scripture, because you will lose the understanding of sacred Scripture.

[“And the one having fallen on this stone will be broken; but on whomever it may fall, it will grind him to powder.”]

Then, that they might know that the penalty is not limited to their being cast out, He added the punishments also, saying, "Every one that falleth on this stone, shall be broken; but upon whomsoever it shall fall, it shall grind him to powder." He speaks here of two ways of destruction, one from stumbling and being offended; for this is, "Whosoever falleth on this stone:" but a…

Those who stumble against the Rock of Christ and take offence at Him will not only be crushed at the second coming, but already here in this life they have been scattered like powder by Christ. They have been scattered over all the earth, as we now see the pitiable Jews to be.

He presents a twofold punishment: "and whosoever shall fall on this stone, shall be broken." This is explained according to Jerome thus: he falls upon the stone Christ who holds the faith concerning him, i.e., concerning Christ, but falls through the sin which he commits against him. Therefore sinners fall, because they do not have charity.

And the chief priests and the Pharisees, having heard His parables, knew that He speaks about them.

What then ought they to have done on hearing these things? ought they not to have adored, to have marvelled at the tender care, that shown before, that afterwards? But if by none of these things they were made better, by the fear of punishment at any rate ought they not to have been rendered more temperate? But they did not become so, but what do they after these things?

See once again that the multitude, which is simple and guileless, follows the truth, while the teachers of the law work evil. But even today there are Jews who seek to lay hands on Christ, but they neither grasp nor understand Him. For they shall grasp the Antichrist and shall bow down and worship him, while Christ will not be grasped, that is, understood, by them.

There follows the time of malice: "and when they had heard, they knew that he spoke of them."

And seeking to lay hold of Him, they feared the crowds, because they were holding Him to be a prophet.

One thing they know which is true concerning Him; they esteemed Him a Prophet, though not understanding His greatness in respect of His being the Son of God. But the rulers feared the multitude who thought thus of Him, and were ready to fight for Him; for they could not attain to the understanding which the multitude had, seeing they thought nothing worthy concerning Him.

And when the chief priests and Pharisees heard his parables, they realized that he was speaking about them. And they sought to arrest him, but they feared the crowds because they regarded him as a prophet.

And there follows the malice: "and seeking to lay hands on him, they feared the multitudes, because they held him as a prophet." And this is clear.