That is, reverent toward everything divine, neglecting nothing in relation to God.
Titus 1:8. Self-controlled,
The temperate person [must be temperate] not only in food, but also in tongue, hands, and shameful glances; for in this consists true temperance.
Titus 1:9. holding fast the true word, which is in accordance with the teaching,
Instead of: caring, taking concern for this matter. "Faithful," that is, handed down through faith, and not through reasoning. Therefore he also said: "according to the teaching," showing that he could teach even without external wisdom. It is not grandeur of expression that is needed, but experience in the Scriptures and power in thought. For only such teaching will be successful, as was the teaching of Paul himself.
Titus 1:9. that he may be able both to exhort in sound doctrine and to convict those who contradict.
That is, so that he might both guard and strengthen his own, and repel enemies. For whoever is not "mighty" either to fight against enemies "and bring every thought into captivity to the obedience of Christ" (2 Cor. 10:5), or to comfort, admonish, and establish his own, is a false bishop. Other virtues can be found even in subordinates, such as hospitality, sound-mindedness, and the rest; but what most characterizes a bishop is the ability to teach.
Titus 1:10. For there are many who are also insubordinate, idle talkers and deceivers,
He pointed to the root of all evils — insubordination. Since the insubordinate person does not want to be under authority, but pushes forward to have authority over others, he has obviously learned nothing sound or right, because he did not want to endure being taught. One who deceives himself and others is an idle talker and a mind-deceiver.
Titus 1:10. "especially those of the circumcision,"
The Lord also reproached them for their love of preeminence, because they had not abandoned this malady even after they came to believe.
Titus 1:11. whose mouths must be stopped:
They must be rebuked sharply, so that their "mouths" are stopped. But what is the benefit, when they are of those who do not submit to the truth? For them there is none, but it is beneficial for those whom they might corrupt if the bishop remains silent; for their corruption the bishop himself will give an account. Therefore the mouths of such people must be "stopped": if you cannot do this, do not be a bishop.
Titus 1:11. They corrupt whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for the sake of shameful gain.
You see what disobedience combined with love of money and "shameful gain" means, how "they subvert whole houses"! They are levers in the hands of the devil, by means of which he destroys the "houses" of God.
Titus 1:12. One of themselves, a poet of their own, said: "Cretans are always liars, evil beasts, idle bellies."
Titus 1:13. This testimony is true.
The question is asked, why did he adduce a "testimony" from Greek writers and approve it, even though it is unjust? And who said this? In truth, it was said by Epimenides, who more than all the Greek sages was occupied with prophecies and the propitiation of the gods, and was renowned for the beneficent gift of divination. He, indeed, when he saw that the Cretans had erected a tomb for Zeus and began to honor him as some mere man, as though zealous for the glory of their national god, composed the following address to Zeus: being such and such, the Cretans erected a tomb for you; but you have not died, you live forever. To this saying Paul now gives a "testimony" of truth. But how does he do this? For if it was spoken truly, then Zeus is immortal. No, it was not to this that the apostle directed attention when he said the "testimony" is true, but to the fact that Epimenides called the "Cretans liars" and the rest. And what is the benefit of a pagan testimony? Through this he best influenced them, presenting to them as proof of their arrogance their own writers. Paul customarily does this; in a similar manner he also reasoned with the Athenians on the basis of Aratus: what that poet ascribes to the falsely-named god Zeus, he applies to the true God, since on the basis of their own testimonies they can be better convinced. In a similar manner, with the Jews he speaks on the basis of the prophets, and not on the basis of the Gospels. So also does God act, drawing each person to Himself by the path that is familiar and trustworthy to that person. Thus, the "Magi" — by means of a "star" (Matt. 2:1–2), Saul through the sorceress (1 Sam. 28:3–25), since he believed her, and the diviners — through animals (cows) that carried the ark; and this does not mean that the pagan diviners speak the truth — on the contrary, He convicts them by their own mouths. And God allowed Balaam to bless and prophesy (Num. 23–24). For He customarily always shows condescension for our benefit. Why then did Christ and Paul forbid the demons to speak and testify? Because the signs were sufficient for believing; and Christ Himself preached about Himself, and this was sufficient. Moreover, the demons were not worshipped, and the idol did not speak of itself. Therefore the demons were forbidden to speak.
Titus 1:13. Rebuke them sharply for this reason.
Since they are, he says, liars, which is explained by their craftiness, and gluttons, a strong and reproachful word is needed for them, for gentleness is useless with them. Just as one who rebukes a gentle person destroys him, so too one who flatters a shameless person ruins him, not allowing him to know himself. Here, the apostle says, it is not strangers who must be rebuked, but one's own people.
Titus 1:13. "that they may be sound in the faith,"
Titus 1:14. Not giving heed to Jewish fables
So then, soundness consists in not introducing anything false, anything foreign to the faith; just as submitting oneself to the law does not mean boldly relying on faith that it is sufficient for salvation. This is no small error. Jewish customs are doubly fables: both because they are untimely and utterly useless, and because attending to them is harmful. So then, just as one must not believe fables, neither should one believe these. Of course, the holy books of the Old Testament, rightly understood, are not fables. And how could they be, when from them we learn the evangelical truth? But wrong interpretations and additions — that is what the fables are. Listen to what follows next.
Titus 1:14. And the ordinances of men who turn away from the truth.
You see that what he calls fables? The commandments of men, as it is written in Isaiah (Isa. 29) and in the Gospel (Matt. 15), and the rest, obviously, also the observances concerning foods, as is evident from what follows.