The Lantern

Commentary on Romans · Chapter 71

CCEL

Chapter Seven

Rom. 7:1. Do you not know, brethren (for I speak to those who know the law), that the law has dominion over a man as long as he lives?

Rom. 7:2. A married woman is bound by law to her living husband; but if the husband dies, she is released from the law of marriage.

Rom. 7:3. Therefore, if while her husband is living she is joined to another man, she shall be called an adulteress; but if the husband dies, she is free from the law, and she will not be an adulteress if she marries another man.

Having left moral teaching, he returns to dogmatic teaching and proves that his listeners should no longer remain under the law. The law, he says, as you yourselves know, has authority over a person as long as the person remains alive; for it does not extend to the dead. So you too, he says, have died to the law, and therefore it no longer had authority over you. He hints at this at the beginning, and further on speaks of it from another side. Namely: when the husband dies, the wife has the right to join in marriage with another. Here he likened the husband to the law, and the wife to his listeners. Then he should have said: therefore, brethren, the law has no authority over you, for it has died. But the apostle did not say this, so as not to grieve the Jews, but instead presents the wife as having died, that is, the Jews themselves, who therefore enjoy a twofold freedom. For if the wife is free from the authority of the law when her husband dies, how much more is she free when she herself has died.

Rom. 7:4. So you also, my brethren, have been put to death to the law through the body of Christ, so that you might belong to another, to Him Who rose from the dead, that we might bear fruit to God.

If you have died, he says, then you are not under the law. For if a wife after the death of her husband is not subject to liability, then all the more is she free from the yoke of the law when she herself has died. Notice how wisely he proves that the law itself wants people to leave it. And so you also were freed from the law through the body of Christ, crucified for us. For the body was put to death for this very reason, that you might die to the law and be under the authority of another, who died for you and then rose again. For the law does not live after it has died, but Christ lives even after He died, so that you have no right to depart from Him who lives. And what is the benefit of this? "That we should bear fruit to God," that is, so that from that marriage in which we were united with Christ, we might bear children to God, that is, good works.

Rom. 7:5. For when we were living according to the flesh, the passions of sins, which were made manifest through the law, were at work in our members, so as to bear fruit unto death.

Proving that the law in no way helps us in avoiding fleshly passions, but only reveals them, he says: when we were in the fleshly life and in evil deeds, the sinful passions, exposed by the law and made known through the law, were at work in our members. He did not say that the members produce vices, lest he give occasion for blaming the flesh. For the soul is like a musician, and the members are a lyre. If the musician plays poorly, then the lyre also produces bad sounds. So then, when we were under the law and could not escape the passions, we bore forth death through evil deeds.

Rom. 7:6. But now, having died to the law by which we were bound, we have been released from it, so that we might serve God in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter.

So as not to grieve the Jews, he did not say: the law has been abolished, but: "we have been released from it," that is, we have been set free, liberated, died and became dead and motionless with respect to that bond which held us. And this bond is sin; for we were held by it as by a chain. And we died to sin, so that we might "serve God in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter." In ancient times virtue was difficult, because Adam received in his mortal body a multitude of natural deficiencies; but now by the grace of Christ in baptism our nature has received help from the Spirit, Who made us new and young and freed us from the oldness and weakness of the letter. Therefore in the time of the law virginity was a rarity, but now in the Church there are thousands who piously lead a virginal life. The same must be said also concerning contempt for death.

Rom. 7:7. What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. But I had not known sin, except through the law. For I would not have known lust, if the law had not said: Thou shalt not covet.

The Apostle said many things that could have appeared to be an accusation against the law: namely, "sin shall not have dominion over you, for you are not under the law but under grace" (Rom. 6:14), and "the law came in besides, and so the transgression was multiplied" (Rom. 5:20), and also "the old letter" (Rom. 7:6). Therefore, in order to remove such a suspicion, he introduces an objection in the form of a question and says: what then shall we say about the law? Is it that the law is sin? Then he resolves this objection, first answering in the negative, as he usually speaks of what is utterly absurd, and then offering proofs. The law, he says, is not sin, but an indicator of sin; for I would not have known desire "if the law had not said: you shall not desire." But then how did the flood come about? How was Sodom burned, if before the law they did not know that desire is evil? They knew even then, but at that time desire had not been intensified, and therefore they did not recognize it with the same thoroughness with which they came to understand it when the law was given. Originally they knew desire only through the natural law, but afterward also through the written law, which is why it became an occasion for greater punishment; and this came about not from the teachings of the law, but from the carelessness of those who paid no heed to the precepts of the law, as the Apostle shows further on.

Rom. 7:8. But sin, taking occasion by the commandment, wrought in me all manner of desire: for without the law sin is dead.

He did not say that the law "produced the desire," but rather "sin" (which, according to Chrysostom, is a careless and corrupted will), and the devil (for some understood sin to refer to him), or the inclination toward pleasure and the tendency toward what is worse, used the very instruction of the law for evil. It would be unjust to blame a physician who, when a patient with a fever is ready to drink water unceasingly, does not allow him to drink, and thereby intensifies his desire to drink; for it is the physician's task to forbid, while it is the patient himself who must refrain from drinking. So too the law intended through its instruction to draw man away from desire, but the sin-loving will intensified the desire and produced not just one, but every kind of desire, straining to do evil. For when someone is forbidden something, he rages all the more. Thus sin is revealed when the law has been transgressed. "For without the law sin is dead," that is, it is not considered to exist. But when there is a law prescribing what is proper, then sin lives, that is, it exists and is recognized as sin by those who transgress the law and sin knowingly.

Rom. 7:9. I was alive once without the law; but when the commandment came, sin revived,

Rom. 7:10. And I died.

Before Moses, he says, I lived without the law, which is why I was not subject to strict condemnation (here in his own person he means human nature); but when the commandment came, it was revealed that sin is sin: for although people sinned even before, they were not aware of it. And this is precisely the benefit of the law, that it made people conscious that they are sinning. The words "I died" should be understood in two ways — both thus: "I sinned," and thus: "I became liable to greater punishment," for which not the law is to blame, but the one who heeds it. Consider, for example: someone is sick and does not realize that he is sick; then a physician comes to the sick man and reveals to him that he is sick, and that he ought to abstain from such-and-such food, as it aggravates the illness; the sick man did not listen to the physician and died.

Rom. 7:10. And so the commandment, which was given for life, served for me unto death,

Rom. 7:11. Sin, having taken opportunity through the commandment, deceived me and through it killed me.

He did not say: the commandment became death for me, but: "it served," thereby explaining the extraordinariness and strangeness of such an incongruity. The purpose of the commandment is to lead to life, for which reason it was also given. But if death resulted from it, the commandment is not to blame for this: for sin deceived me and put me to death through the commandment, that is, the inclination toward the worse and the corrupt and sin-loving heart, or rather — pleasure. For if there were no commandment showing sin, then I would not have been regarded as one committing sin, nor would I have been subject to punishment; for the word "put to death" should be understood in both senses, both of sin and of punishment, as was also said above concerning the word "I died."

The entire essence of the apostle's thought is this: when there is no law, sin is not imputed; but when the law came and was transgressed, sin was revealed and came to life, so that through the transgression of the commandment, sin—that is, the exposure and condition of sin—emerges, whereas before it neither existed nor was imputed, because there was no law either. Therefore the law in itself was not the cause of sin; but neither could it deliver from sin, so that because of this weakness of the law we came to have need of grace.

Rom. 7:12. Therefore the law is holy, and the commandment is holy and righteous and good.

Here he very clearly shut the mouths of the Marcionites, Manichaeans, Simonians, and all who condemn the Old Testament; for he clearly proclaims that the law is holy, and the commandment is holy, and just, and good. He distinguishes the law from the commandment as the general from the particular; for in the law, one part constitutes doctrines and another commandments. Thus, both the doctrines of the law are holy, and the commandments concerning conduct are holy and just and good. Consequently, they are the ordinances of a good and righteous God, even though the aforementioned heretics blaspheme that the law originates from an evil god.

Rom. 7:13. So then, did that which is good become deadly to me? By no means; but sin, showing itself to be sin because through that which is good it causes me death.