Phil. 3:5. A Hebrew of Hebrews.
As for my ancestors, I am, he says, descended from noble Jews. It was possible to be of the race of Israel but not a Hebrew of Hebrews. For with many the matter was spoiled by the fact that they did not even know the Hebrew language, living in dispersion among the Gentiles, and did not precisely observe the Scriptures. But I, he says, am a Hebrew, that is, I preserve this character. Or the apostle is pointing by this to his especially noble origin.
Phil. 3:5. By teaching a Pharisee,
What the apostle spoke of above, namely: circumcision, descent from the race of Israel, and so on — all of this did not depend on his own power. Now, however, he speaks of a matter that was accomplished by his own choice: "according to the teaching," he says, "a Pharisee," that is, according to the study of the law. The Pharisees were the most renowned sect among the Jews.
Phil. 3:6. as to zeal – a persecutor of the Church of God,
Since some of the Pharisees were not particularly zealous for the law, the apostle says that he was so zealous that he persecuted the disciples of Christ.
Phil. 3:6. Blameless according to the righteousness of the law.
Since many were zealots out of love of power and for other motives, and not for the sake of the law, the apostle says that, being blameless according to the righteousness of the law, how could I have been a persecutor for the sake of anything human, and not out of divine zeal.
Phil. 3:7. But what things were gain to me, those I counted loss for Christ.
Phil. 3:8. Indeed, I also count all things as loss for the excellence of the knowledge of Christ Jesus, my Lord.
Here the heretics who condemn the law say: behold, Paul calls it "loss" — how then could it have been given by God? But first of all, let us be grateful that the Holy Spirit so arranged it that they accept these words as if speaking in their favor. If this were not so, they would simply have destroyed these words, as they did many others. Then, pay attention: the apostle did not say directly that the law is loss, but "I count" it "as loss," since the law in itself is not loss. Otherwise, how could it lead to Christ, when understood correctly? Before, understanding it falsely, I did not turn to Christ; but afterwards, having learned the truth, I turned to Christ, and the law then showed me that it was loss at the time when I, understanding it falsely, did not turn to Christ. But in itself the law is gain. Listen further: he did not say "what I considered an advantage," but "what was," since the law is truly an "advantage," because, freeing people from savagery and superstition and becoming a ladder, it leads us to life in Christ. Just as one who ascends a ladder does not despise the steps — on the contrary, he remains grateful, because without them he could not have ascended. So also the law was gain, but now we count it as loss and harm, not because it is such in reality, but because there is a greater grace. Or as a man possessing silver, if he finds gold and cannot possess both, counts it a harm to hold on to the silver and keeps the gold — so also the law becomes a harm if it leads away from Christ, but if it were to lead to Him, it would not be a harm. Therefore, he says, I not only formerly counted the law as loss, but even now I count it as such. Why then? Because of the surpassing excellence of grace. Do you see, he makes a comparison. But only things of the same kind are compared, and therefore what surpasses, surpasses something of its own kind. The law too is knowledge, but a lesser one; just as a lamp is light, but not such light as the light of the sun, although it is still light.
Phil. 3:8. for Him I have given up everything, and count all things as rubbish, in order to gain Christ
For Christ's sake, he says, I renounced everything, that is, I counted all things as loss, or I rejected everything. Do you see after this that the law is not loss in itself, but for Christ's sake? Whether the word "refuse" refers to the law is not clear. It is more plausible that here he is speaking generally about worldly affairs, for he said above: "for His sake I renounced everything," that is, everything worldly. But if what was said is applied to the law as well, there will be no dishonor to it. For "refuse" is the chaff or stalk of wheat; but the stalk serves as the protection and support of the wheat, so that if there were no stalk, there would be no wheat either. But when the latter has ripened and been gathered, then the stalk becomes unnecessary. In exactly the same way, the law is the confirmation and witness of grace; when the latter appeared, one should no longer remain with the letter of the law.
Phil. 3:9. and be found in Him not with my own righteousness, which is from the law, but with that which is through faith in Christ, with the righteousness from God
So that I might not have my own righteousness, derived from the works of the law, as though already accomplished by me, for there is no righteousness from works, because I have not accomplished these works; but that I might have the righteousness that comes through faith in Christ, which is the righteousness from God, that is, a gift of God — a righteousness that justifies believers by grace. "For if you confess with your mouth Jesus as Lord, and believe in your heart, you will be saved" (Rom. 10:9). And the divine gifts surpass to the greatest degree the insignificance of works accomplished by human effort, just as wheat is much better than straw.
Phil. 3:9. by faith;
Phil. 3:10. That I may know Him, and the power of His resurrection,
So, knowledge comes through faith. For what reasoning will prove the resurrection to us? None, but faith. If the resurrection is known by faith, then how will the greater thing—the birth—be known by the mind? But why is it greater? Because there are many examples of resurrection, since many were raised even before Christ. But no one was born of a virgin. Therefore the righteousness that is from God consists in faith, that is, it rests upon it and has it as its foundation. He said: "and the power of the resurrection." Indeed, great power is needed in order to rise again. And on the other hand, the resurrection gives us power to walk along the same path by which Christ walked.
Phil. 3:10. and participation in His sufferings,
Being persecuted and oppressed, he says, we become partakers of the sufferings of Christ. For if we did not believe that we would reign with Him, we would not endure so much and so greatly. Note that the one who suffers most truly believes in the resurrection of Christ. Listen further.
Phil. 3:10. Becoming conformed to His death,
That is, becoming completely like Him. As He suffered from people, so I too must suffer. Because persecutions and sufferings depict the image of His death, and we, so to speak, become christs insofar as we suffer. Do you see how great is the dignity of sufferings?
Phil. 3:11. If by any means I might attain unto the resurrection of the dead.
What then? If you had not suffered, Paul, would you not have risen? But by resurrection understand here His most glorious ascension on the clouds, because all will rise, but not all will be caught up on the clouds: sinners below await the Judge, while the saints are caught up on the clouds to meet the Lord. You will understand what has been said from the following. Christ died, he says, and I die. He rose with glory, and I strive to attain the same glorious resurrection. Notice the caution of the one who accomplished so much and who is above other men: "that I may attain," he says, for I am not yet certain — so humble-minded is he. He speaks of this in another place as well: "Therefore let him who thinks he stands take heed lest he fall" (1 Cor. 10:12); and again: "lest, having preached to others, I myself should be disqualified" (1 Cor. 9:27).
Phil. 3:12. I say this not because I have already attained, or am already perfected;