Chapter Two
Phil. 2:1. Therefore, if there is any consolation in Christ, if any comfort of love, if any fellowship of the Spirit, if any mercy and compassion,
Phil. 2:2. then make my joy complete: be of one mind,
These words mean the following: if you wish to bring me any consolation in my trials; if you wish to show any comfort that love produces; if you intend to prove that you have some fellowship with me in spiritual matters and for the Lord's sake; if you grieve for me and sympathize with my sufferings; then for all this repay me with mutual love for one another. Notice how he sees their unanimity as a personal benefit to himself and considers it as though he himself had been deemed worthy of a kindness. And he did not say: bring me joy, but "fulfill." You, he says, have begun joy in me and have already brought me peace; I desire that this joy be brought to completion. And what is my joy? Not that I should be delivered from danger, or receive something from you, but that you should be of the same mind.
Phil. 2:2. Have the same love,
This is more than thinking alike. "Have the same love." When you are loved exceedingly, respond not with weak love, but with equal measure.
Phil. 2:2. Be of one accord and of one mind;
Be as though one soul, not by nature, but by thoughts and agreement; to this the apostle points with the words: "be of one mind."
Phil. 2:3. Do nothing out of selfish ambition or vainglory,
Nothing, he says, should be done out of envy or rivalry, which happens when we say: look, I will exert myself so that so-and-so does not surpass me; this is precisely what contentiousness (έριθεία) consists of. Then the apostle presents vainglory as the mother of such rivalry, because the former is born from the latter. When we seek the glory of men, what will we not do for it?
Phil. 2:3. But in humility consider one another as superior to yourselves.
Now the apostle shows us the path by which we can avoid vainglory, and offers us saving instruction. If, he says, you imagine that the other person is not simply greater than you, but exceedingly surpasses you, and by great humility you are convinced that this is truly so, then you will honor him in every way. Acting thus, you will not be grieved when you see that others also honor him; even if he were to revile or strike you, you would bear it patiently, because having acknowledged him as superior to yourself, you will not even envy him, for envy is directed toward equals, not toward those whose preeminence we have acknowledged. And he, in his turn, will think that you are more excellent than he, and thus complete peace will reign between you.
Phil. 2:4. Let each of you look out not only for his own interests, but each of you also for the interests of others.
When I care about what is beneficial for you, and you about what is beneficial for me, then there will be no place for vainglory, nor for quarrels, nor for anything bad whatsoever, but life will be angelic and divine.
Phil. 2:5. For let the same mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus.
As Christ says: "Be merciful, just as your heavenly Father is merciful" (Lk. 6:36), and then: "Learn from Me, for I am gentle" (Mt. 11:29); so also Paul, teaching humility, in order to shame us all the more, brings forth Christ as an example, as he also says in another place: "Though He was rich, yet for your sakes He became poor" (2 Cor. 8:9). When he points to the Son of God, who is higher than every height and yet humbled Himself so greatly, which of those who think highly of themselves would he not put to shame by this?
Phil. 2:6. He, being in the form (μορφή) of God, did not consider it robbery to be equal with God;
Count how many heretics are overthrown here. Marcion of Pontus said that the world and the flesh are evil, and that therefore God did not assume flesh. Marcellus of Galatia, Photinus, and Sophronius said that the Word of God is a power and not a hypostatic being, and that this power dwelt in Him Who came from the seed of David. And Paul of Samosata said that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are mere names ascribed to one person. Arius said that the Son is a creature. Apollinarius of Laodicea said that He did not assume a rational soul. So then, see how all these heretics fall by almost a single blow: "being in the form of God." How then do you, Marcellians, say that the Word is a power and not a substance? The form of God means the substance of God, just as the form of a servant means the nature of a servant. And how do you, Samosatan, say that He began His existence from Mary? For He pre-existed in the form and substance of divinity. But see how Sabellius also falls. "He did not consider it robbery," says the apostle, "to be equal with God." "Equal" is not said of one person; if He is equal, He is equal to someone. Thus it is clear that two persons are spoken of. And Arius is refuted in many ways: "in the form of God," that is, in substance. And he did not say "having become" — γεγονώς, but "being" — ὑπάρχων, which is similar to the saying: "I am He Who Is" (Ex. 3:14). And: "He did not consider it robbery to be equal with God." Do you see the equality? After this, how do you say that the Father is greater and the Son is lesser? But look at the senseless obstinacy of the heretics. The Son, they say, being a lesser God, did not consider it robbery to be equal with the great God. But first of all, what Scripture teaches us that there is a lesser and a greater God? Thus teach the pagans. And that the Son is also a great God, hear what Paul says: "looking for," he says, "the appearing of the glory of the great God and our Savior Jesus Christ" (Tit. 2:13). Then, if He is small, how did He not consider it robbery for Himself to be great? Furthermore, Paul, intending to teach humility, would have appeared absurd if he were suggesting the following: since the lesser God did not revolt against the greater God, you also must humble yourselves before one another. For what kind of humility is it when the lesser does not revolt against the greater? That is mere powerlessness. Humility is that He, being equal and co-equal in power with God, voluntarily became man. So then, enough about this. Next, see what Paul says: "He did not consider it robbery." When someone has stolen something, he is afraid to set it aside, lest he lose what does not belong to him. But when he has something by nature, he easily disregards it, knowing that he cannot be deprived of it, and if he should seem to renounce it, he will take it up again. Thus the apostle says that the Son of God was not afraid to lower His own dignity, because He possessed it — that is, equality with God the Father — not through robbery, but recognized this dignity as belonging to His own nature. Therefore He also chose self-emptying, since even in self-emptying He preserves His greatness.
Phil. 2:7. but emptied Himself, taking the form of a servant
Where are those who say that He descended not voluntarily, but fulfilling a command? Let them know that He emptied Himself as Lord, as One having authority over Himself. By saying "the form of a servant," the apostle thereby puts Apollinarius to shame; because He who takes the form—μορφή—or, in other words, the nature of a servant, also has a fully rational soul.
Phil. 2:7. Having become like men.
Based on this, the Marcionites say that the Son of God became incarnate only in appearance; for, they say, do you see how Paul says that He took the likeness of a man and clothed Himself in human form, and did not essentially become a man? But what does this mean? It means that the Lord did not have everything of ours, but lacked something, namely: He was not born in the natural order and He did not sin. But He was not only what He appeared to be, but also God: He was not an ordinary man. Therefore the apostle says "in the likeness of men," because we are soul and body, but He was soul and body and God. On this basis, when the apostle says "in the likeness of sinful flesh" (Rom. 8:3), he does not mean that He did not have flesh, but that this flesh did not sin, and was like sinful flesh in nature, but not in evil. Thus, just as there the likeness is not in the sense of complete equality, so here too he speaks of likeness in the sense that He was not born in the natural order, was sinless, and was not a mere man.
Phil. 2:7. and in appearance having become as a man
Since the apostle said that "He emptied Himself," lest you consider this an act of change and transformation, he says: remaining what He was. He took on what He was not; His nature did not change, but He appeared in outward form, that is, in the flesh, because it is proper to flesh to have a form. For when he said, "taking the form of a servant," after that he dared to say this as well, as if thereby stopping the mouths of some. He said well, "as a man," since He was not one of many, but as one of many. For God the Word did not turn into a man, but appeared as a man, and being invisible, appeared having a "form." Some, however, interpreted this passage thus: "and in form," as already truly a man, just as John says in the Gospel: "glory as of the Only-Begotten of the Father" (Jn. 1:14), instead of saying: the glory which is fitting for the only-begotten to have; because "as" — ὡς — signifies both hesitation and affirmation.
Phil. 2:8. He humbled Himself, being obedient even unto death, and death on a cross.