Zevachim3

1(Fol. 88b) R. Anani b. Sasson said: "Why has the section of sacrifices been joined [in the Scripture] closely to the section of the priestly garments? To teach thee just as the sacrifices make atonement, so also do the priestly garments make atonement. The [priest's] checkered coat atones for murder, as it is said (Gen. 37, 39) And they slaughtered a he-goat and dipped the coat in blood; the breeches atone for whoredom, as it is said (Ex. 25, 42) And thou shalt make them linen breeches to cover the flesh of their nakedness; the mitre atones for pride. This is explained by R. Chanina: 'Let the mitre come which the priest wears upon the head and atone for the sin committed through the head (pride).' The girdle atones for evil thoughts; it atones for the very thing it rests upon; the breastplate atones for injustice, as it is said (Ib. ib. 15) And thou shalt make the breastplate of judgment. And Ephod atones for idolatry, as it is said (Hos. 3, 4) And without an ephod or teraphim. The robe atones for slander. Whence do we infer this? Said R. Chanina: 'Let the robe, which gives forth a voice [through its bells] come and atone for the sin that comes through the voice.' The golden plate atones for impudence; for concerning the plate it is written (Ex. 28, 38) And it shall be always upon his forehead, and concerning impudence it is written (Jer. 3, 3) Yet thou hadst a harlot's forehead." Is this so indeed? Has not R. Joshua b. Levi said: "For two things we do not find an atonement in the sacrifices; we find, however, an atonement for them in another place, and the two things are: Murder and slander. Murder is atoned through the breaking of the heifer's neck and slander, through the incense; for R. Chanania was taught: Whence do we infer that the incense possesses the faculty of making atonement? It is said (Num. 17, 12) And he put on the incense, and made atonement for the people, and again it was taught in the college of R. Ishmael: For which sin does the incense atone? For slander; let the quiet thing (incense) come and atone for sins committed in the quiet. Hence there is a contradiction concerning the atonement for murder, and concerning the atonement for slander [for in the former Baraitha it states that the incense and the heifer caused their atonement]. The contradiction concerning murder is not difficult to explain, for the former deals with an instance where the murder is recognized [hence the increase] but the latter deals with an instance where the murderer is not recognized. If the murderer is recognized then why the incense; rather should the murderer be executed? It deals with a case where although the murderer was cautious yet he was not legally warned [aganist his act]. The contradiction concerning slander is also not difficult to explain, for the latter atones for slander committed in secrecy, while the former deals with slander committed publicly.