(Fol. 21a) Rami b. Chama recited that those wicks and oils with which the sages said that the Sabbath lamp should not be lit, are also forbidden to be lit in the Temple; for it is written (Ex. 27, 20.) To cause a light to burn always. After he learned it, he explained its reason: "The flame shall burn by itself and not through any other cause." An objection was raised from the following Mishnah: "Wicks were made from the old clothes of the priests and from their girdles for the lamp in the Temple"; [and these were made of wool which is not permitted to be used for the Sabbath candles]. "The rejoicing of Succa is different." [was the explanation].
(Fol. 21b) Our Rabbis taught: "The proper observation [of kindling the light] at the feast of Chanukah is one light for the whole household; but those who are strict light a candle for each individual member, and those that are extremely strict light up eight candles on the first day, decreasing the number by one on each succeeding day. This is according to the opinion of the school of Shammai; but the school of Hillel says that we should light up one on the first day and on the remaining seven days the number of candles should be increased [by one each day]."Ullah said: "There is a dispute between R. Jose b. Abin and R. Jose b. Zabida, two Amorites of Palestine, concerning this. One said, 'The interpretation of the school of Shammai is a reminder of the future days [which are always decreasing], and the interpretation of the house of Hillel is for the passing days [which increase daily]'; and the other said, 'The reason of the school of Shammai is that just as the offerings of the best of the Tabernacles [was decreased daily], so are the candles of Chanukah, and the reason of the house of Hillel is that we may promote [a person or thing] to a higher grade of sanctity, but we must not degrade.'" Rabba b. b. Chana in the name of R. Jochanan said: "There were two old men living in Zidon; one acted in accordance with the opinion of the school of Shammai and the other acted in accordance with the opinion of the school of Hillel; one gave as his reason that the Chanukah lamps are to be lit in the same manner as the sacrifices of the feast of Succoth were offered [in a decreasing manner]; and the other gave as his reason that we may promote [a person or thing] to a higher grade of sanctity, but we must not degrade."
What is the origin of the feast of Chanukah? Our Rabbis taught: "On the twenty-fifth day of Kislev, the eight days of Chanukah begin. During this period no funderal address is to be made, nor are fasts to be held. When the heathens (Greeks) entered the Temple they defiled all the holy oil they found in it; but when the Hashmonaim (Maccabeans) prevailed and conquered the heathens, they sought and found one remaining jar of oil, stamped with the seal of the High Priest [proving that it had not been defiled]. Though the oil contained in the jar would have sufficed for one day only, a miracle occurred, and it lasted for eight days [during which time more oil was prepared]. On the anniversary of this occasion a feast was instituted with the reciting of Hallel and other praises."
(Fol. 22a) R. Cahana said that R. Nathan b Minyumi expounded in the name of R. Tanchum: "What is meant by the passage (Gen. 37, 24.) And the pit was empty; there was no water in it. Since the text says The pit was empty, do I not know that there was no water in it? And what is intimated by saving There was no water? Indeed there was no water but there were serpents and scorpions in it."
(Fol. 23b) R. Huna said: "He who is accustomed to lighting many lamps (on the Sabbath, holiday and Chanukah) will have scholarly sons; he who is strict in the observance of the Mezuzah will be worthy of having a fine dwelling; he who is strict in the observance of the Kiddush [on the Sabbath and festivals] will be worthy of having jars filled with wine." R. Huna was wont to pass by the door of R. Abin, the carpenter; noticing that R. Abin was accustomed to light many lamps [on the Sabbath eve] he said: "Great men will come forth from this house," and so it was. There came forth from that house R. Ide b. Abin and R. Chiya b. Abin. R. Chisda was wont to pass by the door of the father of R. Sizbi; noticing that [R. Sizbi's father] was accustomed to light many lamps (on the Sabbath eve), he said: "A great man will come forth from here." And, in consequence, R. Sizbi came forth from there. R. Joseph's wife was accustomed to light the lamps late, so R. Joseph said to her: "We have studied in a Mishnah: 'He took not away the pillar of the cloud by day, nor the pillar of fire by night. (Ex. 13, 22.) We infer from this that the pillar of cloud was finished up with the pillar of fire [that it came ahead of time] , and the pillar of fire was finishing up with the pillar of cloud [that also came ahead of time].'" She then decided to light the lamps very early. She was then told by a certain old man: "We are taught in a Mishnah 'No one should do anything [whatever is to be done] either earlier or later than the time set for it.'" Raba said: "He who loves scholars shall have children that are scholars; he who respects scholars shall have sons-in-law that are scholars; he who fears scholars shall himself be a learned man; and if he is not of such a class [because he did not study] then his words will be respected like unto those of learned men."
(Fol 25 b) R. Juda said in the name of Rab: "Thus it was the custom of R. Juda b. Elaya to have a vessel with warm water brought to him every Friday afternoon. He would wash his face, hands, and feet and then wrapping himself in a linen garment in which were placed Tzitzis, he would sit like an angel of the Lord of Hosts."
It is written (Lam. 3, 17.) And thou hast removed my soul from peace. R. Abuhu said: "This refers to the kindling of the Sabbath lamp," And I forgot happiness, (Ib.) "This," said R. Jeremiah, "refers to a bath-house." R.Jochanan said: "This refers to the washing; of his hands and feet in warm water." R. Isaac said: "This refers to a nicely fixed bed with comfortable bedding upon it." R. Abba said: "This refers to elegant furniture and an elegantly robed wife. Our Rabbis taught: "Who is to be considered rich? 'Every one,' says R. Meier, 'who enjoys his riches [whether great or little].' R. Tarphon says: 'Every one who has a hundred vineyards and a hundred fields with a hundred slaves to labor in them.' R. Akiba said: 'He who has a wife that is becoming in all her acts.' R. Jose said: 'He who has a privy within his house.'"
(Fol. 26a) R. Tarphon said: "The Sabbath lamps should be lit only by means of olive oil." Thereupon R. Jochanan b. Nuri stood up and said: "What shall the Babylonians do who have nothing else but poppyseed oil? And what shall the Medeans do who have nothing else but nut-oil? And what shall the Alexandrians do who have nothing else but radish-oil? And what shall the Kapadocian do who have none of these oils but naphtha? We therefore have no recourse but to accept the words of the sages who pointed out those oils with which it is not permitted to light the Sabbath lamp [and claimed the others to be suitable for that purpose]."
(Fol. 28b) What remains of the discussion regarding the so-called badger (Tachash) which existed in the days of Moses? R. Elaya in the name of R. Simon b. Lakish said: "R Meier was wont to say that 'The badger which existed in the days of Moses was a creation of its own kind, and the sages were not able to decide whether it belonged to the domestic species or to the wild animal species; it had but one horn on its forehead; it was assigned at that time to Moses, who made the covering for the Tabernacle of its skin; after that it disappeared.' Since he says that it had one horn on its forehead, we infer that it was a levitically clean species, for R. Juda said: "The ox which Adam, the first man sacrificed, had but one horn on its forehead, as it is written (Ps. 69. 32.) And this will please the Lord better than an ox or bullock having horns and cloven hoofs.' " Behold! the word used is Makrin (horns)! R. Nachman b. Isaac said, Although we read Makrin, (horns) the word really written is Makren, (horn, the singular) [Hence we learn that the one-horned beast is of the clean species]. Let us also decide from the same source that the badger was of the cattle species? [For it says. An ox or bull having a horn]. Since there is in existence the Keresh (antelope) which is of the animal species and has but one horn, so I can say, that the Tachash was the very animal called Keresh.
(Fol. 30a) The following question was asked of R. Tanchum of Noy: "Is it permissible to extinguish the light on the Sabbath for the sake of a sick person?" He began his answer by saying: "O thou King Solomon! Where is thy wisdom and where is thy understanding? Not only do the words contradict your father's words but [they are at variance with] thine own utterances also. Thy father David said (Ps. 116, 17.) Not the dead can praise the Lord, and thou sayest (Ecc. 4, 2.) Thereupon praise I the dead that are already dead, and again thou sayest (Ib. 9., 4.) For a living dog fareth better than a dead lion. But this is not difficult to explain. When David said. Not the dead can praise the Lord, he meant thus: 'A man should always occupy himself with the study of the Torah and meritorious deeds before he dies; for, as soon as he dies, he becomes free from the obligation of [studying] the Torah and [fulfilling] meritorious deeds and the Holy One, praised be He! accepts no praise of him.' This is what R. Jochanan said: 'What is meant by the passage (Ps. 88, 61.) Free among the dead, i.e., as soon as a man dies he is freed from the obligation of [studying] the Torah and [fulfilling] meritorious deeds, And when Solomon says (Ecc. 4. 2.) Thereupon praise I the dead that are already dead, he refers to the time when Israel sinned in the deserts. Moses stood up before the Holy One, praised be He! and offered many prayers and supplications unto Him but was not answered. However, as soon as he said (Ex 32, 13.) Remember Abraham, Isaac and Israel, Thy servants, he was forthwith answered. Now, did not Solomon say properly Thereupon praise I the dead that are already dead." It may be explained in another way also. The usage of the world is that if a mortal prince issue a decree, it is doubtful whether it will be complied with or not; even if it be complied with while the prince lives it may not be complied with when he is dead. But Moses, our teacher, has issued many decrees and established many ordinances and they endure forever and ever. Now did not Solomon say properly (Ecc. 4, 2.) Thereupon praise I the dead that are already dead! The passage, Thereupon praise I the dead, etc., may also be explained in another way, as R. Juda said in the name of Rab; for R. Juda in the name of Rab said: "What is meant by the passage (Ps. 86, 17.) Display on me a sign for good that those who hate me may see it. Thus said David before the Holy One, praised be He! 'Sovereign of the universe, forgive me this sin [of Bath Sheba].' Thou art forgiven.' answered the Lord. David then said to the Lord: 'Show me a sign while I live.' Whereupon He answered, 'During thy life I shall not make it known but during the life of Solomon, thy son, I shall make it known.' When Solomon had built the Temple he desired to place the ark in the holy of holies, but the gates had become fastened to each other [and they could not be opened]. Solomon then offered twenty-four prayer-songs but was not answered. He then began the prayer (Ps. 24, 7.) Raise your heads, O ye gates and be raised wide, ye everlasting gates, and let the king of glory enter. Thereupon the gates ran after him and opened their mouths and wanted to swallow him up, saying: Who is the King of glory? (Ib.) Solomon replied. The Lord, strong and mighty (Ib.). He then repeated Raise your heads, O ye gates, and raise up, ye everlasting doors, and let the King of glory enter. Who is the King of glory, the Lord of Hosts, He is the King of glory, Selah (Ib.). Still he was not answered; but as soon as he said O Lord God turn not away the face of thy anointed, remember the pious deeds of David thy servant, (II Chr. 6, 12), he was immediately answered. At that moment the faces of David's enemies turned black like the bottom of a pot and then it was known to all that the Holy One, praised be He! had forgiven David that sin. Therefore, did not Solomon properly say. Thereupon, praise I the dead, etc. This is meant by the passage (I Kings 8, 66.) On the eighth day he dismissed the people; they blessed the king and went unto their tents, glad of heart, because of all the good that the Lord had done for David his servant and for Israel his people, i.e.. And they went unto their tents, meaning they found their wives levitically pure. Joyful, because of having enjoyed the Divine Glory; glad of heart, each man's wife had become pregnant with a male child; because of all the good which God had done unto David his servant, that he forgave him that sin; and Israel his people, for they were forgiven their neglect of the observance of the day of Atonement. And when Solomon said (Ecc. 9, 4.) For a living dog fareth better than a dead lion, he meant that which R. Juda said in the name of Rab; for R. Juda in the name of Rab, said: "What is meant by the passage (Ps. 39, 5.) Let me know, O Lord, my end, and what the measure of my days is, I wish to know when I shall cease to be, i.e., thus said David before the Holy One, praised be He! 'Sovereign of the universe let me know my end.' Whereupon the Lord answered him: 'It has been decreed by me that the time of the death of mortal man shall not be known; And the measures of my days what are they (Ib.), David again asked. 'It is decreed by me answered the Lord,' that the measure of the days of a man shall not be known.' Again David asked: 'I wish to know when I shall cease to be.' The Lord then said to him: 'Thou wilt die on the Sabbath.' 'Let me die rather on the first day of the week,' begged David. 'The first day of the week is the day on which thy son Solomon shall be king, and one kingdom must not encroach on the other even by so much as a hair's breath.' 'Let me then die on the Sabbath eve,' pleaded David. Whereupon the Lord said Far better is a day in thy courts than a thousand (Ps. 84, 11), i.e., 'I like one day in which thou art studying the Torah better than a thousand burnt offerings which Solomon, thy son, will sacrifice before me upon the altar.' (Ib. b) Each Sabbath day he would sit and study. On that Sabbath when he was to die, the angel of death came and stood before him, but was unable to do anything because David never once ceased studying. [Said the angel to himself] What shall I do? There was an orchard in the back of David's house; the angel of death went there and shook the trees. David [hearing the noise] went out to see [the cause of the noise]; as he ascended the ladder the angel caused it to break. David fell down and consequently stopped studying; whereupon the angel of death took his life. It so happened that Solomon sent to ask the following questions in the academy: 'My father died and lies in sun; what shall I do? [Am I allowed to remove him from the sun?] And the dogs of my father's house are hungry, what shall I do?' They answered him: 'Cut up a carrion and place the pieces before the dogs. As to thy father, place a loaf of bread or an infant upon his body and then you may carry it away from the sun.' Did not Solomon, therefore, say properly? For a living dog fareth better than a dead lion. And as to the question, which I have been asked in your presence, I say this: a lamp is called Ner and the soul is called Ner; it is better that a human light (lamp) be extinguished than that God's light (life) be extinguished."
R. Juda the son of R. Samuel b. Shilath in the name of Rab said: "The sages wanted to suppress (declare uncanonical) the book of Ecclesiastes because its words are contradictory; but why did they not suppress it? Because it begins and ends with words concerning the Torah. It begins with the words concerning the Torah, for it is written (Ecc. 1, 3.) What profit hath a man of all his toil which he toileth under the sun? Whereupon the school of Janai said, for a thing which [was created] under the sun he hath no profit, but for a thing which is beyond the sun (before creation) he will have profit. It ends with words concerning the Torah, for it is written (Ib. 12, 13.) The end of the matter is, let us hear the whole; fear God and keep His commandments; for this is the whole (duty of) man. What is meant by, this is the whole man? R. Eliezer said: "It means the whole world was created for the sake of him (who fears God)." R. Abba b. Cahana said: "This [fear of God] is equal in importance to the whole world put together." Simon b. Azai and, according to others, Simon b. Zoma, said: "The whole world would not have been created if not for the purpose of providing him (who fears God) with company." And what are the words which contradict each other? It is written (Ecc. 7, 3.) Better is vexation than laughing; and again it is written (Ib. 2, 2.) Of laughter I said, it maketh one praiseworthy; and it is also written (Ib. 8, 15.) Therefore do I praise joy: and again (Ib. 2, 2.) And of joy what doth this do? There is no contradiction; Better is vexation than laughing, means that, the vexation which the Holy One, praised be He! causeth unto the righteous in this world is better than the smile which the Holy One, praised be He! causeth unto the wicked in this world; Of laughter I said, it maketh one praiseworthy, speaks of the smile with which the Holy One, praised be He! will gladden the righteous in the world to come. Therefore do I praise joyfulness, refers to a rejoicing which is caused by a meritorious deed; And of joy what doth this do? alludes to rejoicing which is not the cause of a meritorious deed. We infer from this that Shechinah rests not upon a mood of indolence, nor a mood of grief, nor a mood of laughter, nor a mood of levity, nor a mood of jesting, nor a mood of idle talk, but upon a mood of rejoicing caused by the performance of a meritorious deed; as it is said (II Kings 3, 15.) But now bring me a musician, etc, R. Juda said: "The same should be applied to the study of the Halacha (Laws)." Raba said: "The same is to be applied to a good dream." Is it so? [that Halacha should be preceded by a cheerful thing] . Behold, R. Gidel in the name of Rab said: "Any disciple who sits before his teacher without dropping bitterness from his lips [on account of respect] will be burnt, for it is said (Songs 5, 13.) His lips like lillies, dropping with fluid myrrh. Do not read Mor (fluid myrrh), but read it Mar (bitterness. Do not read Shoshanim (lilies) but read it Sheshonin (who study); [hence we see that a disciple must act with deep respect, and not in a frivolous mood]. This is not difficult to explain: the former refers to the teacher and the latter refers to the disciple; and if you wish you may say both refer to the teacher; and even then there is no contradiction; for the former refers to the time before beginning [the lecture] and the latter refers to the time after the lecture has begun. Just as Rabba did before he began [his lecture] before the Rabbis. He said something humorous which caused the Rabbis to be cheerful, and he then sat down with deep respect to expound the Halacha.
The sages wanted to suppress (declare uncanonical) the Book of Proverbs also, because of its contradictions. Why did they not suppress it then? They said: "Have we not scrutinized the Book of Ecclesiastes and found explanations of the contradictions? Let us search the Book of Proverbs also, until we find explanations." Which are its contradictory words? It is written (Pr. 26, 4.) Do not answer a fool according to his folly, and it is also written (Ib.) Answer a fool according to his folly. [After a study they came to the conclusion that] there is no contradiction; the latter refers to matters of the Torah and the former refers to secular matters. In what respect can the subject of the Torah be explained? In the following way: Rabban Gamaliel was once sitting and lecturing: "In the future women will give birth to children every day, as it is written (Jer. 31, 7.) The pregnant woman and she that travaileth with child together." A certain disciple sneered at him and said: There is nothing new under the sun (Ecc. 1, 9). Whereupon Rabban Gamaliel said to him: 'Come, I will show thee the like thereof in this world." He went and showed him a hen. Again Rabban Gamaliel lectured: "In the future the trees will bring forth fruit every day, for it is said (Ezek. 17. 23.) And it shall produce boughs, and bear fruit, i.e., just as boughs are produced every day so also will fruit be brought forth every day."' Again that disciple sneered at him and said: There is nothing new under the sun (Ecc. 1, 9). "Come," said Rabban Gamaliel to him, "I will show thee the like thereof in this world." Whereupon he went and showed him a Caper-bush. Upon another occasion Rabban Gamaliel was sitting and lecturing: "In the future Palestine will produce ready-made cakes and fine woolen garments, as it is said (Ps. 72, 16.) There shall be an abundance of corn in the land." The disciple again sneered at him and said: There is nothing new under the sun. "Come," said Rabban Gamaliel, "I will show thee the like thereof in this world." Whereupon R. Gamaliel took him and showed him mushrooms and as to [something corresponding to] garments, as it said (Ps. 72, 16.) There shall be palm-shoot [which is covered in the form of garment].
Our Rabbis taught: A man shall always be as patient as Hillel and not as excitable as Shammai. Once it happened that two men laid a wager with one another (Fol. 31a) that whichever would succeed in putting Hillel out of temper should receive four hundred zouzim "I shall go and put him out of temper." said one. It was on Friday afternoon, and Hillel was washing Himself, when the man passed by the door of his house, shouting: "Does Hillel live here? Does Hillel live here?" Hillel wrapped his mantle round him and went out to meet him. "My son," he said to him, "what do you wish?" "I have a question to ask," was the reply. "Ask, my son, ask,"' said Hillel. "Why are the heads of the Babylonians round?" the man asked. "A great question hast thou asked, my son. Because they have no trained midwives." The man went away and after a while, returned calling out, "Does Hillel live here? Does Hillel live here?" Hillel again wrapped his mantle round him and went out to meet him. "My son," he said, "what do you wish?" "A great question have I to ask," he said. "Ask, my son, ask," said Hillel. "Why are the, people of Tarmod (Palmyra) weak-eyed?" asked he. Hillel said: "Thou hast asked a great question. Because they live in a sandy country." The man went away, and after waiting a while, came back shouting: "Does Hillel live here? Does Hillel live here?" Hillel wrapped his mantle round him and went out to meet him. "My son," he said, "what do you wish?" "I have a question to ask." said the man. "Ask. my son, ask.," said Hillel. "Why are the feet of the Africans so broad?" "Thou hast asked a great question! Because they live in marshy land." "I have many more questions to ask," said the man, "but I am afraid lest I shall make thee angry." Hillel, drawing his mantle around him, sat down before the man, saying to him: "All the questions thou hast to ask, please ask." "Art thou Hillel," said he., "who is called Prince of Israel?" "Yes," answered Hillel. "If thou art the one, then I pray there may not be many more in Israel like thee." "Why is that, my son?" asked Hillel. "Because," said the man, "I have lost four hundred zouzim through thee." "Be cautious with thy temper," said Hillel. "Better is it that thou shouldst lose four hundred zouzim, and four hundred more zouzim, but that Hillel should not become excited." Our Rabbis taught that a heathen once came before Shammai and said: "How many Torahs have you?" Shammai replied: "We have two; the written Torah and the oral Torah." The heathen then said to him: "In the written Torah I believe thee, but in the oral Torah I do not believe thee. Make me, therefore, a proselyte on condition that you teach me the written Torah only." Shammai rebuked him sharply and sent him away angry. The heathen then appeared before Hillel, and the latter made him a proselyte. On the first day, Hillel taught him the Aleph, Beth, Gimel, Daleth. On the morrow, Hillel reversed the order of these letters (beginning with the last letter). "Thou didst not teach me so yesterday," said the proselyte to him. "True," said Hillel. "Dost thou not rely upon me? Why then dost thou not rely upon me with the oral Torah?" On another occasion it happened that a heathen appeared before Shammai and said: "Convert me to Judaism but on condition that thou teachest me the whole Torah, while I am standing upon one leg." Shammai drove him off with the builder's cubit (measure) which he held in his hand. Then the heathen appeared before Hillel, and he made him a proselyte, and said unto him: "That which is hateful to thee do not do unto thy neighbor, this is the whole Torah, and the rest is merely its commentary." Again it happened that while a heathen passed by the rear of a synagogue he heard the voice of a scribe who was saying, And these are the garments which they shall make; a breast-plate and an Ephod and a robe. (Ex. 28, 4). "For whom are these?" asked the heathen. "For the High Priest," replied the scribe." So the heathen said to himself: "I shall go and become a proselyte on condition that I be made a High Priest." He came before Shammai and said to him: "Make me a proselyte upon condition that you make me a High Priest." Shammai drove him away with the builders cubit which he held in his hand. The heathen then came before Hillel; the latter made him a proselyte, and said to him: "Is it possible for one to be made a king unless he knows the court ceremonials? Go, study first the court ceremonials." The proselyte thereupon went and learned the Torah. When he came to the passage (Num. 3, 10.) And the stranger that cometh nigh shall be put to death, he asked: "For whom is that passage meant?" "Even for David, the King of Israel," Hillel replied. Then the proselyte came to the following conclusion: "If for Israelites, who are called the sons of God and who on account of God's love shown to them, were called (Ex. 4. 22), My son, my first-born, Israel, a warning is written, And the stranger that cometh nigh shall be put to death, how much more does this apply to the mere proselyte who came with but his staff and traveling bag?" He went to Shammai and said to him: "Am I then eligible to be a High Priest? Behold! It is written in the Torah, And the stranger that cometh nigh shall be put to death." He then went to Hillel and said to him: "O thou forbearing Hillel, may blessings rest upon thy head, because thou hast brought me under the wings of the Shechina." Later all the three proselytes happened to meet in one place and they said: "Oh, the impatience of Shammai could drive us out of this world, but the patience of Hillel brought us under the wings of the Shechina!"
Resh Lakish said: "What is meant by the passage (Is. 33, 6.) And the stability of thy times and the strength of thy happiness shall be wisdom and knowledge; the fear of the Lord is his treasure, i.e., The stability, alludes to the Order of Zerain. Of thy time, refers to the Order of Moed; The strength, refers to the Order of Nashim; Of thy happiness, alludes to the Order of Nezikin; Shall be wisdom, refers to the Order of Kadshim; And knowledge, alludes to the Order of Taharoth. And after all these, The fear of the Lord [shall be] his treasure." Rabba said: "When a man is brought to Judgment [after he dies] he is asked: 'Hast thou dealt honestly? Hast thou had regular time for the study of the Torah? Hast thou married? Hast thou waited for salvation (Messiah)? Hast thou been a searcher after wisdom? Hast thou [cultivated thy mind to] conclude (to bring out one thing from another)?' And after all these if The fear of the Lord is his treasure, it (His Torah) counts; if not, it does not count. It is likened to the man who said to his messenger: 'Bring up to the upper floor a Kur of wheat.' The messenger went and when he had brought it up the man asked of him: 'Hast thou mixed a Kab of the Sand of Chumta in it?' 'No,' answered the messenger. Whereupon the master said: 'It were better if thou hadst not brought it up altogether.' " It was taught in the academy of R. Ishmael that a man has the right to mix a Kab Chumtin in every Kur of crop and he need not worry [in fear of doing wrong, for the sand preserves the crop]. Rabba b. R. Huna said: "Whoever possesses knowledge of the Torah without having (Ib. b) fear of the Lord is likened unto a treasurer who has been entrusted with the inner keys [of the treasury] but from whom the outer keys were withheld." R. Janai announced: "Oh, for him who has no courtyard but makes a gateway for his court!" R. Juda said: "The world would not have been created by the Holy One, praised be He! if not for the purpose that people should fear Him, for it is said (Ecc. 3, 14.) And God hath so made it that man should be afraid of Him." R. Simon and R. Elazar were sitting; they noticed that R. Jacob b. Acha was walking and passing by them. "Let us stand up before a man who fears sins." said one, to which the other replied: "Let us get up before a man who is a great scholar." Whereupon the former remarked to the latter: "I tell thee to get up before a man who fears sins and thou sayest to me to get up before a man who is a great scholar." It may be deduced [from the following] that the one who said "For a man who fears sins," was R. Elazar, for R. Jochanan in the name of R. Elazar said: "The Holy One, praised be He! has nothing [better] in His world but fear of Heaven, as it is written (Deu. 10, 12.) And now, Israel, what doth the Lord thy God require of thee, but to fear the Lord thy God. It is also written (Job 21, 28.) And he said unto the man. Behold, the fear of the Lord, that is wisdom. And in Greek Hen means one. The deduction is correct.
R. Ulla expounded: "What means the passage (Ecc. 7, 17.) Be not wicked too much? A man should not be too wicked, but he may be a little wicked? [It means rather that] if one has eaten garlic causing him to have a bad odor, shall he eat again and let more bad odor come?" Raba b. R. Ulla expounded: "What is meant by the passage (Ps. 73, 4.) For there are no deadly fetters for them; but their strength is firm? i.e., the Holy One. praised be He! said 'It is not sufficient that the wicked do not fear [for future punishment] nor feel any pangs concerning the day of death, but that their heart within them is becoming as strong as the vestibule hall'; and that also is meant by Rabba, for Rabba said: What means the passage (Ib. 49, 14.) This is their way, their folly, i.e., the wicked know that their (wicked) path leads them to death, and their kidneys are becoming fat [without worrying over it]. Perhaps you will say that this is the cause of their forgetting it; therefore it says (Ib.) And they keep the future with pleasure in their mouth, Selah.'"
(Mishnah) For three sins, women die of childbirth: because they are not careful [in observing the laws] concerning Niddah, Challa and lighting [the Sabbath] candles.
(Gemara) What is the reason for such punishment for Niddah? R. Isaac said: "Because she committed corruption in the inner part of her womb, therefore should she be beaten in the inner part of her womb." This may be true regarding Niddah, but what is the reason for Challa and the lighting of the candles? It is as a certain Galilean expounded before R. Chisda: Thus said the Holy One, praised be He! "One fourth of a Log of blood did I put in your body; concerning blood (menstruation) have I warned thee. (Fol. 32a) I have called ye the first product and have charged ye concerning the first of your dough; the soul which I have put in you is called Ner (light) and I have charged ye concerning Ner (the Sabbath light); if you observe these things then it is well, but if not I shall take your souls." And why just at the time of childbirth? Rabba said: "When the ox has already fallen down, sharpen the knife for him." Abaye said: "Let the maid continue her rebellion, it will go under one rod." R. Chisda said: "Leave the intoxicant alone, he will fall by himself." Mar Ukba said: "The shepherd is lame and the goats are running away swiftly. [When they appear] at the gate of the fold, there are words (bargaining), but in the stalls (where the sheep are delivered), strict account is taken." R. Pappa said: "At the gate of business [you have] many friends, but at the gate of disgrace, no friend." And when are the sins of men investigated? Resh Lakish said: "When they pass over a bridge." A bridge and nothing else? But he intended to say all dangerous places like a bridge. Rab would not embark on a ferry where there were any heathen; he said: "His time to be punished may happen to be due [while on the boat] and I may be seized with him." Samuel [on the contrary] would not embark on a ferry unless there was also a heathen abroad, for he said: "Satan has no power over two persons of different nationalities." R. Janai always examined the ferry first and then he embarked on it. For R. Janai followed his own principle, and he said: "A man should never expose himself to danger expecting that a miracle will be wrought for him; for it may be that such a miracle will not be wrought, and even if a miracle be wrought for him, it will be deducted from the rewards due him for his merits." R. Chanin said: "What is the Biblical passage for this? I am not worthy of all the kindness, and of all the truthfulness that Thou hath done unto thy servant. (Gen. 32, 11)." R. Zeira never walked under date-trees on a day when the Shutha wind blew. Our Rabbis taught: "For three sins women die of childbirth." R. Elazar says: "Women die prematurely" [instead of child birth]. R. Acha said: "For the sin of washing the dirt of their children on the Sabbath"; and others say, "Because they call the holy ark. The chest." We are "taught that R. Ishmael b. Elazar says: "For two sins common people die; because they call the ark, The chest, and because they call the synagogue The people's house.'" We are taught that R. Jose says: "Three breaches through which death enters were created for a woman. Others say three causes of premature death were created for woman; Niddah, Challa and lighting the lamps." One is in accordance with the opinion of R. Elazar and the other is in accordance with the opinion of the Rabbis.
R. Isaac, the son of R. Juda, said: "A man should always pray (for mercy) that he may not become sick; for when one is taken sick he is told 'Bring evidence in your favor and then you will be acquitted [from the illness].'" Mar Ukba said: "What is the Biblical passage [to prove this]? That if the fallen fell from thence (Deu. 22, 8), i.e., from himself must come evidence [ as to his right to rise from his sickness]." In the academy of R. Ishmael it was taught: "That the fallen fell from thence i.e., This one was destined to fall off since the creation; behold, he has not yet fallen and the passage calls him [already] Nofel (one who has fallen). This teaches that good is brought about through the agency of good persons, and evil is brought about through the agency of wicked persons."
Our Rabbis taught: "He who becomes sick and is at the point of death, should be told to confess, for all those who were about to die had to confess. When a man goes to the market place, let him deem himself handed over into the custody of the officers [to be brought before court]. If he has a headache, let him deem himself fastened with a chain around his neck. If confined to his bed, let him deem himself brought upon the scaffold [to be punished]; for when one ascends the scaffold [to be punished], if he has prominent interceders, he is pardoned, but if not, then he is not pardoned; and these are man's interceders [before divine Judgment] — repentance and meritorious deeds. Even if nine hundred and ninety-nine plead against him and only one in favor of him he is saved; as it is written (Job 23, 23.) If there be now about him one single angel, as one defender out of a thousand to declare his uprightness for any man, then is He gracious unto him and saith, 'Deliver him from going down into his pit.'" Rabbi Eliezer, the son of R. Jose the Galilean, said: "Even if nine hundred and ninety-nine parts in that one angel are against him, and but one for him, he is still saved, for it is written Mailitz Echad (one defence) out of a thousand."
We are taught that R. Simon b. Gamaliel says: "The laws concerning holy offerings, Teruma and tithes are the principal parts of the Torah and yet their observance was entrusted to the common people."
(Ib. b) We are taught that R. Nathan says: "As a punishment for not fulfilling vows, the wife of the man dies, as it is said (Pr. 22, 27.) If thou have nothing to pay, why should He take away thy bed from under thee?" Rabbi says: "For the sins of [unfulfilled] vows children die when still young, as it is said (Ecc. 5, 5.) Suffer not thy mouth to cause thy body to sin, etc. Why should God be angry because of thy voice, and destroy the work of thy hand? We must say that this refers to the sons and the daughters of man." There is a difference of opinion between R. Chiya b. Abba and R. Jose; one said: "The sin of not having Mezuzoth is the cause of children's death," and the other said: "The sin of being remiss in the study of the Torah is the cause of children's death." The one who laid the affliction to the sin of Mezuzoth, holds that a passage can be connected with another one preceding it and thus explained, but not with a passage that comes before the preceding one; and the one that laid the affliction to the sin of being remiss in the study of the Torah, holds that passage can be connected even with one that comes before a preceding passage, and thus explained. There is also a difference of opinion between R. Meier and R. Juda. One said: "It (the death of children) is due to the sin of Mezuzoth," while the other said: "It is due to the sin of Tzitzith." It is right according to him who said it is due to the sin of Mezuzoth, for it is written (Deu. 11, 20.) And thou shalt write them upon the doorposts of thy house, and immediately following is written In order that your days and the days of your children may be multiplied; but according to the one who said it is due to the sin of Tzitzith, what is his reason? R. Cahana, and according to others, Shila Mari, said: "Because it is written (Jer. 2, 34.) Also on the end of thy skirts is found the blood of the souls of the innocent needy ones." R. Nachman b. Isaac said: "The one who says it was due to the sin of Mezuzoth, derives his opinion from this (Ib.) Not while breaking in (thy house) didst thou find them, i.e., making the doors like a breaking in (without a Mezuzah)."
Resh Lakish said: "Whoever observes carefully the precepts concerning Tzitzith will, as a reward, have two thousand eight hundred servants to wait upon him; for it is said (Zech. 8, 23.) Thus said the Lord of Hosts, 'In those days it shall come to pass that ten men out of all the languages of the nations, shall take hold — yea, they shall take hold of the skirts of him that is a Jew, saying. Let us go with you, for we have heard that God is with you.' " We are taught that R. Nechemia says: "As a punishment for gratuitous hatred, the penalty is strife at the home of that man; and his wife will have miscarriages; and the sons and daughters of that man will die prematurely." R. Elazar, the son of R. Juda, said: "The punishment for the sin of neglecting to separate Challah is an unblessed harvest gathering; a curse will be sent upon the prices of food; and they will sow, but strangers will eat them up, as it is said (Lev. 26, 16.) Then will I also do this unto you; I will inflict on you terror, consumption and fever that consume the eyes and cause sorrow to the heart; and you shall sow your seed in vain, for your enemies shall eat it up. Do not read Behala (terror) but B'chala (on account of Challah), and if the separation of Challah is observed, then, blessings will follow, as it is said (Ezek. 44, 30.) And the first of your dough shall you give to the priest, to cause a blessing to rest on thy house." The punishment for the sin of neglecting laws concerning Terumah and tithes, is that the sky will withhold rain and dew; high prices [in food] will prevail; there will be no profits, and men will run about to earn a livelihood and will not succeed; as it is said (Job 24, 19.) Drought and heat speedily consume the snow waters; so doth the grave those who have sinned. What does that prove? In the academy of R. Ishmael it was taught that it means: "On account of your failure to discharge the duties which I commanded you to perform during the summer you will be robbed during the snow-water winter." But if they do give [Terumah and tithes] they will be blessed, as it is said (Malachi 3, 10.) Bring ye all the tithes into the storehouse that there may be provision in my house, and prove me but herewith, saith the Lord of Hosts, if I will not open for you the windows of heaven, and pour out for you a blessing Aad b'li duy? What is meant by Aad b'li duy? Rami b. Chama in the name of Rab said: "Until your lips grow tired of saying it is enough;" The penalty for the sin of robbery is an invasion of locusts; famine prevails, and people will be fed on the flesh of their own sons and daughters; as it is said (Amos 4, 1.) Hear this word, O ye cows of Bashan, that are on the Mount of Samaria, who oppresseth the poor, who crusheth the needy. (Fol. 33a) Raba said: "For instance, those women of Mechuza who eat but do nothing [they force their husbands to deal dishonestly and to rob]; and it is also written (Ib. ib. 9.) I had smitten you with blasting and mildew, etc., and your vineyards, your fig-trees and your olive trees did the caterpillar devour. It is also written (Joel 1, 4.) What the caterpillar left hath the cankerworm eaten, and that which the cankerworm left hath the crickets eaten; and it is also written (Is. 9, 19.) And he snatcheth on the right hand and is (yet) hungry; and he eateth on the left hand, and is not (yet) satisfied; every man shall eat the flesh of his own arm. Do not read Zero'o (his arm) but read Zaro (his children)." As punishment for the sin of delaying sentence, perverting sentence, corrupting sentence, and neglecting to study the Torah, the sword [of an enemy], with its terrible preying system, pestilence and famine, will come. People will eat but will never be satisfied; they will eat their bread by weight; as it is written (Lev. 26, 25.) And I will bring over you the sword, avenging the quarrel of my covenant. And it is also written (Ib. ib. 26.) When I break unto you the staff of bread; and ten women shall bake your bread in one oven, and they shall deliver your bread by weight, and ye shall eat and not be satisfied, i.e., the word Brith (covenant) refers to the Torah, for it is written (Jer. 33, 25.) If my covenant (Brith) were not by day and night, etc., and it is written (Lev. 26, 43.) Because even they despised my ordinances. As punishment for the sin of swearing in vain, swearing falsely, defaming of the name of God, and desecration of the Sabbath, wild beasts multiply, cattle are destroyed, the people decrease, and the roads become desolate, as it is said (Lev. 25, 23.) And if notwithstanding these things, ye will not be reformed by me. Do not read B'aile (these things) but read it B'ala (swearing), and it is written (Ib. ib. 22.) And I will send out against you the beasts of the field, etc. [Hence we know that the above punishment is for swearing falsely]. It is written concerning swearing falsely (Ib. 19.) And ye shall not swear by my name falsely and thou shalt not thus profane the name of God (Chilalta); concerning the defamation of the name of God it is written (Ib. 22, 12.) So that they profane not my Holy name (T'chalalu), and concerning the desecration of the Sabbath, it is written (Ex. 31, 14.) Every one that defileth it (Mechalaleha) shall surely be put to death. We infer from the word, Chillul (profanation) which appears in all three places [that the punishment for defaming God's name and desecrating the Sabbath is the multiplication of wild beasts, as it is in the case of swearing falsely]. As a punishment for the sin of shedding blood, the Temple is destroyed and the Shechina departs from Israel, as it is written (Num. 35, 33.) And ye shall not defile, etc., and ye shall not render unclean the land which ye inhabit, in the midst of which I dwell, i.e., but if ye do render unclean the land which ye inhabit, then ye will neither inhabit it nor will I live in your midst. As a punishment for the sin of adultery, idolatry and for the neglect of the laws concerning land in the Sabbatical years and the years of Jubilee exile comes, and other nations come and occupy the places of those exiled; as it is written (Lev. 18, 2.) For all these abominations have the men of the land done, etc., and again (Ib.) And the land became defiled, etc. Wherefore I have visited its iniquity upon it, etc. It is also written (Ib. ib. 28.) That the land may not submit you forth when ye defile it. Concerning the warning against idolatry, it is written (Ib. 26, 30.) And I shall cast your carcasses, etc. It is also written further And I will make desolate your sanctuary, etc. And ye will be scattered among the nations. Concerning the warning in the matters of the Sabbatical year and the year of Jubilee, it is written (Ib. ib. 34.) Then shall the land satisfy its Sabbath, all the days of its desolation, when ye are in the land of the enemies, etc. All the days of its supposed desolation shall it rest.
As a punishment for the sin of lascivious talk, many oppressions and severe decrees are renewed, and the youth of Israel die, and orphans and widows cry and receive no answer as it is said (Is. 9, 16.) Therefore will the Lord have no joy in their young men, and on their fatherless children, and on their widows will he have no mercy; for every one is an hypocrite and an evil-doer, and every mouth speaketh scandalous words. For all this anger is not turned away, but His hand still remaineth stretched out. What is meant by And his hand still remaineth stretched out? R. Chanan b. Raba said: "Everybody knows why a bride enters the nuptial chamber, yet he who speaks about it with profane language, even if a divine decree granting seventy years of happiness were sealed for him. such decree would be changed to evil against him." Raba b. Shila in the name of R. Chisda said: "Whosoever defiles his mouth (by lascivious talk) has Gehenna made deeper for him; for it is said (Pr. 22, 14.) A deep pit for the mouth of strange words (immoral talk)." R. Nachman b. Isaac said: "Even he who but listens to such talk and remains silent will have the same punishment inflicted upon him; for it is said (Ib.) And he that is abhorred of the Lord shall fall therein." R. Oshia said: "He who makes himself free [from all other thoughts] devoting himself entirely to sin, shall have bruises and wounds spread upon him, as it is said (Ib. 20, 30.) The bruises of a wound are a means of cleansing for the evil. Moreover he will be punished with dropsy, for immediately following is said And stripes (will reach) the inner chamber of the body. R. Nachman b. Isaac said: "The sign of an evil act is dropsy."
Our Rabbis taught: "There are three sorts of dropsy: thick swelling of flesh, resulting from sin; round and smooth [filled with water] due to hunger; and swelling [with a feeble appearance of the body] due to sorcery." Samuel the junior suffered [with dropsy]; he said: "Sovereign of the universe! Who can determine its cause? [And I may be judged wrongly]." Whereupon he became well. Abaye was afflicted with it, so Raba said to him: "I know perfectly well that Nachmeini does not eat sufficiently [and hunger is its cause]." Raba himself [also] suffered with it. Has not Raba said: "More numerous are those killed by the pot (by delay of discharge) than are those killed by starvation." [Hence it shows that with Raba it was caused by neither hunger nor the pot for he surely must have taken warning against it.] It is different with Raba because he was compelled to delay easing himself when he was lecturing and was not able to leave. Our Rabbis taught: "There are four signs [which disclose secrets]: Dropsy is a sign of sin; Jaundice is a sign of gratuitous hatred; Poverty is a sign of pride, and Croup is a sign of slander." Our Rabbis taught: "Croup comes upon the world as punishment (Ib. b.) for the sin of not giving tithes." R. Elazar the son of R. Jose says: "It comes as punishment for slander." Raba, and according to others, R. Joshua b. Levi, said: "What is the Biblical passage [that proves this]? But the king shall rejoice in God: everyone that sweareth by Him, shall be stopped (Ps. 63, 12). The following question was asked by the scholars: "Does R. Elazar the son of R. Jose intend to say Only for slander? [differing with his contemporary on the whole subject] or does he merely add slander to the previous one?" Come and listen to the following: When our Rabbi entered the academy of Jabnai, they found R. Juda, R. Elazar the son of R. Jose and R. Simon there. The following question was asked in their presence: "Why does this sickness (croup) begin with the bowels and end with the mouth?" Whereupon R. Juda the son of Elaye the chief speaker in every instance, answered and said: "Although the kidneys are the seat of deliberation and the heart understands and the tongue forms the sentence, nevertheless the mouth finishes (makes it irrevocable)." R. Elazar, the son of R. Jose answered, and said: "Because they eat unclean things [committed by the mouth]." How can we imagine that croup is the punishment for eating unclean things? We must therefore say: "Because they eat unprepared things [not having given the tithes thereof]." R. Simon answered and said: "For the sin of neglecting the study of the Torah." The Rabbis then said to him: "Women [who die of croup] prove the contrary." "Because," said R. Simon, "they cause their husbands [to neglect the Torah]." "Gentiles who die from it disprove your opinion." "Because they cause Israel [to neglect the study of the Torah]." "Infants who die of croup will prove the contrary." "Infants die of it because they interrupt their fathers [while studying the Torah]." They finally asked him: "Children attending school [and having no time to interrupt their fathers] who died of croup will prove the contrary to your opinion." "Such cases," replied R. Simon, "are as R. Gurion said; for R. Gurion, and according to others, R. Joseph b. Shemaye, said: 'As long as there are righteous people in a generation, they are seized for [the sin of] their generation; but if there are no righteous people then the children are seized for [the sin of] their generation.'" R. Isaac b. Zeira, and according to others, R. Simon b. Nezira, said: "What is the Biblical passage [that explains it]?" If thou knowest this not, O thou fairest of women, go but forth in the footsteps of the flock and feed thy kids around the shepherd's dwellings (Songs 1, 8.) And we are told that it means the kids that are pawned for the sins of the shepherds." We conclude from this that R. Elazar merely added slander. It is concluded. Why was he called the chief speaker in every place? For R. Juda, R. Jose, and R. Simon were once seated together, and Juda b. Gerim was seated near them. R. Juda opened the conversation by saying: "How beautiful are the works of this nation! (the Romans). They have established streets and markets, built bridges across the rivers and established baths." R. Jose listened to these remarks, but kept silent. R. Simon b. Jochai, however, replied, saying: "Everything they have established is for their own benefit. They have opened the markets that they may place harlots there; they have established baths for their own refreshment, and bridges [were built to enable them] to raise tolls." Juda b. Gerim thereupon went and disclosed their conversation, and it reached the ears of the government. Whereupon an edict was issued [to the effect] that R. Juda, who had praised [the works of the Romans] should be promoted; [consequently he became the chief speaker in every place]; that R. Jose who had remained silent, should he exiled to Sephoris; and that R. Simon who had censured [their works] should be executed. Thereupon R. Simon and his son hid themselves in a house of study. Every day his wife brought them bread and a cup of water, with which they maintained themselves. Then the decree became more severe [to discover the condemned]. R. Simon said to his son: "Behold! Women are easy-minded; the Romans may cause her pain and then she will disclose our hiding place." So they went away [from the academy, without telling even his wife] and hid themselves in a cave. There a miracle occurred and a carob-tree and a fountain of water were created for them. They took off their clothes and, absorbed in study, sat in the sand up to their necks the whole day. At the time of service they would put on their clothes, but after they were through with the service, they again took off their clothes so that they might not become worn out. After they had been sitting thus for twelve years in the cave, Elijah came, stopped at the door of the cave, and said: "Who will inform the son of Jochai that the King has died and his decree has been annulled?" Upon hearing this, they left the cave. When they noticed some people plowing and sowing, one of them exclaimed: "Behold, these people are neglecting eternal life and occupy themselves with the transient life!" Upon whatever they fixed their eyes, a fire came and devoured it instantly, until a Bath-Kol (heavenly voice) came forth and said to them: "What! Are ye come forth to destroy my world? Get ye back to your cave." Accordingly they returned to their cave and sat there twelve months more. They then pleaded, saying: "Even the judgment of the wicked in Gehenna lasts no longer than twelve months [and therefore it ought also to be sufficient for our crime ]." Upon which a Bath-Kol came forth and said: "Come ye forth from your cave." They finally came forth. Whatever R. Elazar struck [with his look] was healed by R. Simon [also with his look], until R. Simon said to his son: "My son, it is sufficient for the world that you and I are learning the Torah." One Friday afternoon they saw an old man hurrying along with two bunches of myrtle in his hand. "Why dost thou need these?" said they to the man. "[To enjoy the smell] in honor of the Sabbath," was his reply. "Would not one bunch," they remarked, "be enough for the purpose?" "Nay," the old man replied, "one is in honor of Zachor (remember) and one in honor of Shamor (keep)." Thereupon R. Simon remarked to his son: "Behold! How dear are the commandments to Israel." Upon hearing [that they had gone out of the cave], R. Phinias b. Yair, R. Simon's son-in-law, went out to meet him; he took him into a bath-house, washed his entire body and tried to soften his flesh [which had hardened through sitting so long in the sand]. While he was cleaning R. Simon's body, he noticed that his skin was blistered and cracked; R. Phinias began to weep, and the tears which fell upon R. Simon's wounded body caused him such severe pain that he also wept. "Woe unto me," said R. Phinias, "that I see you in such condition." "Happy art thou," said R. Simon unto him, "that thou seest me in such condition, because, hadst thou not seen me so, then would I not have been what I am." Before this incident, when R. Simon b. Jochai asked a question of R. Phinias b. Yair, the latter would reply to it in twelve different ways; but after this incident, when R. Phinias b. Yair asked any question, R. Simon b. Jochai replied to it in twenty-four different ways. R. Simon then said: "Since a miracle happened to me, I shall therefore improve something." For [thus we learn from Jacob, as] it is written (Gen. 33, 18.) And Jacob came safely, upon which Rab said, "Safe with the body, safe with his wealth and safe with his Torah"; And he encamped before the city. (Ib.) Rab said: "He invented a coin for them," and Samuel said: "He established streets for them." R. Jochanan said: "He established baths for them." "Have you anything which lacks [religious] improvement?" R. Simon inquired. "Yes," they answered, "there is a place which is considered doubtful [and] unclean, (Fol. 34a) and it causes the priests annoyance because they have to go around that place." He asked them: "Is there anyone who knows if that place ever had the status of levitical cleanliness?" An old man replied: "Here, I remember, b. Zakai plucked lupines of Terumah." Whereupon R. Simon did likewise. Wherever the ground was hard [showing that it was not dug] he declared it purified, and around the soft spots he made marks [so that priests should take heed not to cross them]. When he had finished, he heard the old man remark: "Ben Jochai purified cemeteries." "If thou wert not with us," said R. Simon, "or even hadst thou been with us but didst not agree, then thou mightst fairly say it, but now being one of us and having agreed, people will say, 'O since harlots paint one another [to look nice], how much more ought scholars [be regardful of one another's honor].'" Thereupon R. Simon fixed his eyes upon the old man and the latter died instantly. As R. Simon went out upon the street, he noticed Juda b. Gerim (the tale-bearer). "O," said he, "does this one still live and exist in the world?" R. Simon fixed his eyes upon him and Juda became instantly a heap of bones.
A man must say three things in his house on Friday when it is becoming dark: "Have you set aside the tithes?" "Have you put up the Erub?" and "Light the [Sabbath] candles." Whence do we learn this? R. Joshua b. Levi said: "The passage says (Job 5, 24.) And thou shalt know that there is peace in thy tent, and thou wilt look over thy habitation, and shalt miss nothing."
Rabba b. R. Huna said: "Although the Rabbis said that a man must say three things in his house on Friday, etc., he must say them in a gentle way so that his family may accept them in good faith." R. Ashi said: "Although I never heard what Rabba b. R. Huna had said, yet I have always done so as a matter of common sense."
(Ib. b) What time of the day is called Twilight? From the time that the sun sets [and] as long as the eastern horizon is red [form the reflection]; when the lower horizon is pale, but the upper horizon is not, it is still Twilight. When the upper horizon is as dark as the lower one, night has set in. This is according to R. Juda. R. Nechemia says: "[The duration of twilight is] so long as it takes a man to walk half a mile from the moment the sun sets." R. Jose says: "Twilight lasts as long as a twinkling: this one comes and that one goes, and it is impossible to determine its exact time."
(Fol. 35a) R. Chiya said: "Whoever desires to see the well of Miriam, let him ascend to the top of Mount Carmel and, looking down, he will observe in the sea a stone in the form of a sieve, and this is the well of Miriam." Rab said: "A movable well is clean (not subject to levitical uncleanliness). This concerns only the well of Miriam."