Chapter XIV.
The refutation of those who slander the miracles, which takes place at a banquet, concerning which three things.
1. And it came to pass, when he entered into the house etc. Above he refuted those slandering Christ's miracles in a council; here he openly refutes them at a banquet. For in these two places especially detraction and scrutiny were accustomed to occur, namely in councils and at banquets. This part, which contains the present chapter, is divided into three parts. In the first of which he refutes the Pharisees who were watching; in the second he instructs the guests reclining at table, at that place: And he said also to those who were invited: and in the third he teaches the crowds following after, at that place: And great multitudes went with him.
First, the Pharisees who were watching are refuted, concerning which three things.
Concerning the refutation of the watchers, he proceeds in this order: because first is set forth the watching of the Pharisees: second is added the exposure of those observed, at that place: And behold, there was a certain man who had the dropsy: and third, the refutation of those exposed, at that place: And he took him and healed him. The watching of the Pharisees, by which they were watching Christ, is described with respect to two things, namely with respect to the kindness of Christ and the malice of the Pharisees.
2. (Verse 1.). As regards Christ's kindness, therefore, he says: And it came to pass, when he went into the house of one of the chief Pharisees on the Sabbath to eat bread, in which Christ's wondrous kindness appears: great in this, that he dwelt among mortal men, though he was God; Baruch 3: "This is our God, and no other shall be esteemed in comparison to him." "Afterward he was seen upon earth and conversed with men." Greater indeed, because he dwelt among his own persecutors: whence was fulfilled in him that saying of Ezekiel 2: "Son of man, unbelievers and subverters are with you, and you dwell among scorpions." But the greatest kindness, because he dwelt among them even to intimate fellowship, so that there might be fulfilled that saying of Revelation 3: "I stand at the door and knock: if anyone shall open to me, I will enter in to him and will sup with him, and he with me." In this, therefore, that he entered another's house, Christ's humility is commended: in this, that it was the house of a Pharisee, his charity: in this, that he ate another's bread, Christ's own poverty: and in these things the supreme kindness is shown, by which the Most High willed to be humbled for us, the Most Just to dwell among the impious, the Most Rich to become poor among men: whence 2 Corinthians 8: "You know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, that, though he was rich, for your sake he became poor, that by his poverty we might be made rich."
3. Second, however, with regard to the malice of those watching, he adds: And they were watching him. The Evangelist does not say in what respect, so as to intimate that they were watching both his words and his miracles, and they were watching in order to censure and accuse him; above in the eleventh chapter: "The Pharisees and the lawyers began to press upon him vehemently and to assail his mouth, lying in wait for him and seeking to catch something from his mouth, that they might accuse him"; whence also John 15: "If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you; if they have kept my word, they will keep yours also." They were also watching his miracles, according to what is said in Mark 3: "They watched him, whether he would heal on the Sabbath, that they might accuse him." Whence this watching proceeded from scheming malice, against which it is said in Proverbs 24: "Do not lie in wait nor seek wickedness in the house of the just, nor lay waste his rest." But because it is most difficult for a malicious man to escape the scrutiny of his neighbor, therefore it is said in Proverbs 23: "Do not eat with an envious man, and do not desire his foods, because in the likeness of a soothsayer and a diviner he judges what he does not know. Eat and drink, he will say to you; but his mind is not with you. The foods you have eaten you will vomit up, and you will lose your fair words."
4. (Verse 2). And behold, a certain man who had the dropsy. After having described the watching of the Pharisees, here secondly he describes the exposure of the observers; concerning which three things are introduced, namely: The infirmity disposing toward the exposure, the question that exposes, and the dissimulation that conceals.
First, therefore, with regard to the infirmity disposing toward the exposure of the observers, he says: And behold, a certain man who had the dropsy was before him. In the literal sense, this man with dropsy, by his manifest and grievous infirmity, was providing a way to confute and expose the perfidy of the Jews. And since the time and place presented themselves, therefore he says: And behold, as though the Lord had then brought him into their midst; whence Sirach 39: "The works of all flesh are before him, and nothing is hidden from his eyes." "Nor is it to be said: What is this, or what is that? For all things shall be sought in their time"; and afterwards: "All the works of the Lord are good, and every work he will furnish in its hour." Whence this bodily infirmity was effective for assailing and purging spiritual infirmity, because it was directly contrary to it. For this man with dropsy was before Jesus to implore mercy, which the Pharisees were opposing. For he was imploring the mercy of God because he was a man: for Sirach 18: "The mercy of God is upon all flesh"; and because he was an infirm man, according to that passage in Sirach 11: "There is a man who is feeble and in need of recovery, more failing in strength, and the eye of God has looked upon him for good"; and because he was before him, because such persons have recourse to God, and to such persons God condescends: the Psalm: "For he has looked down from his holy height; the Lord has looked from heaven upon the earth."
5. (Vers. 3.). Second, as regards the question that uncovers, he adds: And Jesus answering said to the lawyers and Pharisees. He pointedly says answering, although no one had previously asked anything, because he was responding to their thoughts, which he saw and heard, according to that passage in Matthew nine: "When Jesus had seen their thoughts, he said: Why do you think evil in your hearts?" Whence the Gloss: " Jesus answering, the treacherous observers," because it is said in Wisdom one: "The ear of jealousy hears all things, and the tumult of murmurings shall not be hidden." And therefore he responds to their thoughts by posing to them the question which they themselves were also pondering, when he adds: Saying: Is it lawful to heal on the Sabbath?
The Pharisees are read to have posed this question to the Lord, as is read in Matthew twelve: "They asked whether it is lawful to heal on the Sabbath, that they might accuse him." But Luke expresses their thoughts, while Matthew expresses the spoken word. The Lord was asking this of them because they professed themselves to be lawyers; whence the Gloss: "From the lawyers he seeks the judgment of the Law." On account of which, Malachi two: "The lips of the priest shall keep knowledge, and they shall seek the law from his mouth"; and the Gloss on the same passage: "If the priest is questioned about the law, let him teach; otherwise he vainly boasts of a dignity whose function he does not exercise."
6. (Vers. 4.). Third, as regards the dissimulation that conceals, he adds: But they were silent. They were silent because, seeing themselves caught and exposed, they feared being confounded by their own response; whence the Gloss of Bede: "Rightly are they silent who see that whatever they might say would be said against themselves. For if it is lawful, why do they watch? If it is not lawful, why do they tend their cattle ?" Whence by their silence they feigned ignorance, so as to cover over their malice. A similar instance is found in Matthew twenty-one, where, when the Lord had asked concerning the baptism of John, whence it was, they refused to answer, lest they be convicted of unbelief. Whence that passage of Sirach thirty-seven could be said of them: "O most wicked presumption! whence were you created to cover over barren malice?" But when the leaves of words failed them, they had recourse to the darkness of ignorance and the failure of words; whence they were silent not from prudence, but from ignorance, which has malice joined to it; whence Sirach twenty: "There is one who is silent, not having the sense of speech; and there is one who is silent, knowing the fitting time."
7. But he, taking hold of him, etc. After the exposure of the observers, there is added here the confutation of those exposed, which the Evangelist describes in three ways, namely as regards the magnificence of the deed, the efficacy of the word, and the evidence of the sign.
First, therefore, as regards the magnificence of the deed, he says: But He, having taken hold of him, healed him and sent him away. In this, that He took hold of him, His humility is apparent, because He does not disdain to touch infirmities in order to teach humility; on account of which the Apostle says in Hebrews 2: "Nowhere does He take hold of angels, but of the seed of Abraham." In this, that He healed, His power is apparent; whence above in chapter six: "Power went out from Him and healed all." In this, that He sent him away, His generosity is apparent, namely to depart as a free man. For He did not reduce him to servitude on account of the benefit conferred, but sent him away to depart as a free man; the Gloss says: "He sent him away bodily healed, so that he might turn himself to the salvation of souls." Whence above in chapter eight, to that demoniac whom He had healed, He said: "Go to your house and tell how great things God has done for you." And through this, Christ in the manner of performing that miracle, by humility confounds the pride of the Jews; by power, their sloth; by generosity and kindness, their faithlessness, since they themselves would neither deign to touch, nor were able to cure, nor were willing to set free.
8. (Verse 5). Second, as regards the efficacy of the word, he adds: And answering them He said: Which of you shall have an ass or an ox fall into a pit, namely by a chance occurrence, because this possession of temporal things can be endangered and lost in many ways: sometimes from within, through its own death, as we see every day; sometimes from without, through the tyranny of others, as in Job 1: "The oxen were plowing and the asses were feeding, and the Sabeans rushed in and took everything"; sometimes from above, through pestilence; Exodus 9: "Behold, my hand shall be upon your horses and asses and camels and oxen, a very grievous plague"; sometimes from below, through a fall, as here. Whence these things are not to be greatly loved, which can be lost in so many ways.
9. And yet the Pharisees loved these possessions greatly; whence the Gloss says: "You are all alike in this avarice"; for love of ox and ass made them not care about the observance of the Sabbath. Therefore he adds: And will he not immediately pull him out on the Sabbath day? by swift assistance; the Gloss says: "Not providing for the animal, but for his own avarice." And this indeed they considered themselves to do without offense to the Law. If therefore the welfare of a man is to be preferred to the welfare of an ass and an ox, it is manifest that in the healing of a man the Sabbath is not violated; and it is an argument from the greater. For it seems more likely that the Sabbath should be violated by a more servile work, because it is said in Leviticus 23: "You shall do no servile work therein"; but it is a more servile work to pull out an ass or an ox than to heal a man. If therefore he does not violate the Sabbath who pulls an ox from a ditch, much more neither does he who heals a man. For if a work of avarice does not violate it, then neither does a work of mercy, since a work of avarice belongs to servitude, while a work of mercy belongs to generosity.
10. (Verse 6). Third, as to the evidence of the sign, he adds: And they could not reply to these things. The Gloss: "Convicted." For then it is an evident sign that a man has been convicted, when every way of escape fails him. Nor is it a wonder if they could not answer the wisdom of Christ, since not even the wisest could resist his disciples; whence below in the twenty-first chapter: "I will give you a mouth and wisdom, which all your adversaries shall not be able to resist." And this was fulfilled in Stephen, of whom Acts 6: "Then there arose certain of the synagogue which is called that of the Libertines and Cyrenians and Alexandrians, and of those who were from Cilicia and Asia, disputing with Stephen; and they could not resist the wisdom and the spirit by which he spoke."
11. Now, with these things having been treated according to the letter, three things present themselves for our consideration according to the spiritual understanding, which according to the Saints can be drawn from the aforesaid words.
The first is the disease of dropsy, whose property is, as the Gloss says, that "the more one drinks, the more one thirsts"; and in this it designates every concupiscence, which can never be satisfied, and especially avarice, according to that saying of Proverbs 30: "The fire never says: It is enough." Whence it should be noted that there are seven, according to the expositors, accidents of dropsy. — The first is swelling of the body, and by this pride is understood: Deuteronomy 17: "All the people hearing it shall fear, so that no one thereafter may be puffed up with pride," etc.
The second is compression of spiritual things, and in this envy is understood, which compresses spiritual things; Proverbs 14: "Envy is the rottenness of the bones."
The third is stench in the breath, by which wrath is understood, which causes one to burst forth into abusive words; the Psalm: "Their throat is an open sepulchre; they dealt deceitfully with their tongues."
The fourth is sluggishness of the feet, by which sloth is understood: Titus 1: "The Cretans are always liars, evil beasts, lazy bellies"; and Wisdom 15: "Their feet are slow to walk."
The fifth is thirst in the appetite, by which avarice is understood; Proverbs 30: "The earth is not satisfied with water," that is, the earthly man with temporal opulence; and Ecclesiastes 5: "The covetous man shall not be filled with money." The sixth is swelling of the genitals, by which lust is designated; whence in the Psalm: "For my loins are filled with illusions, and there is no soundness in my flesh."
The seventh is infection of the skin or exterior parts, in which gluttony is understood, which is wholly concerned with caring for the skin: Philippians 3: "Whose God is their belly, and whose glory is in their shame, who mind earthly things."
12. The second thing, however, that we ought to consider is the work of virtue, in which is understood the healing of spiritual illness. Concerning this, three things are said, namely that he took hold of him, that he healed him, and that he sent him away. He took hold of him, namely through the infusion of grace: Isaiah forty-two: "I the Lord have called you in righteousness, I have taken hold of your hand and kept you"; Psalm: "Send forth your hand from on high, rescue me and deliver me from many waters," etc. He healed him, however, through the expiation of guilt: Psalm: "Who forgives all your iniquities, who heals all your infirmities"; and Matthew one: "He himself shall save his people from their sins." He sent him away, indeed, through the relaxation of punishment; Matthew eighteen: "The lord, having compassion on that servant, released him and forgave him the debt." And this we ask in the Lord's prayer: "Forgive us our debts," etc.