Chapter XII.
1. Jesus therefore six days before etc. After the conspiracy of the Jews has been described, here is described secondly its strengthening; the conspiracy itself received strength from the indignation of the traitor. This indignation of the traitor, therefore, had its origin in avarice, but its occasion from the pouring out of ointment made at the banquet. Therefore it is described in this manner: first is described the banquet of the Lord; second, the pouring out of the ointment; third, the indignation of Judas; fourth, the defense of Mary.
(Vers. 1.). The banquet was made for Christ the Lord where Lazarus had been raised, six days before the feast day; whence he says: Jesus therefore six days before the Passover, that is, on the sixth day before the Passover, came to Bethany, where Lazarus had been dead, whom Jesus raised. There the banquet was made in the presence of the raised Lazarus; whence he says:
2. (Vers. 2.). And they made him a supper there: because Revelation 3, "If anyone shall open the door to me, I will enter in to him and will sup with him, and he with me." And although it took place in the presence of Lazarus, Lazarus did not minister but ate, so that the truth of the resurrection might be proven: Mark 5, concerning the girl who was raised, "he commanded that something be given her to eat," etc. On account of which he says: And Martha ministered, but Lazarus was one of those reclining at table with him. Martha always ministers and is solicitous as a prudent woman; whence Luke 10: "Lord, do you not care that my sister has left me alone to minister?" Therefore through her we rightly understand the active life, which is anxious with cares.
3. (Vers. 3.). Mary therefore took a pound. Here the second point is touched upon, namely the pouring out of the ointment, which was done by Mary, who neither reclined at table nor ministered, but herself fed the Lord with a special refreshment; whence she burned with vehement devotion toward him, whose devotion is expressed in the ointment poured out. On account of which he says: Mary therefore took a pound of ointment: the quantity of ointment was great, because her devotion was great; not of just any kind, but of spikenard, that is, from nard. Nard is an aromatic herb, as Isidore says, which is of vehement fragrance; on account of which it is said in Song of Songs 1: "While the king was on his couch, my nard gave forth its fragrance." From the spikes of nard a precious ointment is made; whence it is said
Mark 14: "Of spikenard." Pistici: the Gloss says: "that is, genuine," as distinct from adulterated; precious, because it was of great price and value. And she anointed the feet of Jesus; and the house was filled with the fragrance of the ointment. According to the literal sense, the Jews were accustomed to nourish themselves with highly fragrant ointments; therefore the Lord commanded the most precious ointment to be offered to himself, Exodus 30, and prohibited it to others; whence he called it holy of holies, which would be "for a most sweet fragrance to the Lord."
4. (Vers. 4.). One of his disciples therefore said, Judas. The third point is touched upon here, namely the indignation of Judas against the woman, because she had poured out the ointment; on account of which he says: One of his disciples therefore said, Judas Iscariot, who was about to betray him, namely on account of avarice: and on account of avarice he says:
5. (Vers. 5.). Why was this ointment not sold for three hundred denarii and given to the poor? Matthew twenty-six: "To what purpose is this waste? For it could have been sold for much and given to the poor." And because he seemed to have said this out of piety, the Evangelist shows that he said this out of cupidity: on account of which he says:
6. (Vers. 6.). Now he said this, not because he cared for the poor, because he did not care about the poor; against which Ecclesiasticus four: "My son, do not defraud the poor of alms, and do not turn your eyes away from the poor," etc.; but because he was a thief and having the money bag, as steward, he carried what was put in, that is, he carried it away and stole it, and therefore he rejoiced when more was given; whence on account of his avarice he sold the Lord; whence it is said in Matthew twenty-six, that "he went to the chief priests and said: What will you give me, and I will deliver him to you?" Whence Chrysostom: "Avarice reduces the heart to servitude; this made Judas a traitor and Gehazi a leper and delivered Ananias to death."
7. (Vers. 7.). Jesus therefore said to them. The fourth point is touched upon here, namely the excusing of Mary, because Judas was insulting her as if for a wrongdoing; and the Lord wishes to show that she did better than if she had given to the poor: on account of which he says: Let her alone, that is, do not be troublesome to her. He does not blame them, but excuses Mary: That she may keep it for the day of my burial, which indeed is better than giving to the poor.
8. (Vers. 8.). For the poor you will always have with you ; Deuteronomy fifteen: "The poor shall not be wanting in the land of your habitation." But me you will not always have, according to bodily presence; below in chapter sixteen: "I go to the Father, and you shall see me no longer"; and therefore it is more expedient that a benefit of kindness be shown to me: therefore you should not be troublesome: Matthew twenty-six: "Why do you trouble this woman? For she has wrought a good work upon me."
9. Spiritually, two things are to be noted here, namely what that banquet was, and what the ointment was.
And it should be noted that we read of a threefold banquet made for the Lord: the first, by Matthew, the converted publican; Matthew nine: As he sat at table in the house, behold, many publicans and sinners sat at table with him; this is the banquet of the penitent:
The second, by Simon the Pharisee; Luke seven: A certain Pharisee asked Jesus to eat with him: this is the banquet of the proficient, because the Pharisees kept the Law.
The third, by Mary, Martha, and Lazarus in Bethany, as here. Bethany is the house of obedience, and this is the religious life, in which people are in the state of perfection, according to that passage in Matthew 19: If you wish to be perfect, go and sell all that you have, and give to the poor: and this is the banquet of the perfect.
10. Note likewise concerning the ointment according to the spiritual understanding, that it is threefold, whence Mary is also read to have anointed the Lord three times. For there is the ointment of contrition, which was signified in that passage, Luke 7: She began to wash his feet with tears and anointed them with ointment. Of devotion, and this was signified here and in Matthew 26: When Jesus was in the house of Simon the leper, a woman came to him having an alabaster jar of precious ointment and poured it over the head of him as he reclined at table. Of compassion, and this in the last chapter of Mark: Mary Magdalene and Mary the mother of James and Salome bought spices, so that coming they might anoint Jesus. With the first ointment the feet are anointed: with the second, the head: but with the third, the whole body of the Lord:
QUESTIONS.
11. Question I. But it is asked here first concerning what he says, that six days before the Passover he came to Bethany, where he was anointed by Mary:
1. Because in Matthew 26 it is said: You know that after two days the Passover will take place, and afterward, that in the house of Simon he was anointed by Mary: therefore it seems two days before, and here it is said that six days.
2. Likewise, an objection is raised concerning what he says, that she anointed his feet, because in Matthew 26 it is said that she poured it over his head. If she poured it over his head, how did she anoint his feet?
3. Likewise, concerning another contradiction, because there it is said that the disciples, seeing this, were indignant: but here it is said that one was indignant, namely the traitor.
These three contradictions are resolved through three rules of Augustine, from On the Harmony of the Evangelists:
The first, that it should be noted that sometimes one Evangelist says something according to the historical sequence,
another says it by way of recapitulation. And through this the first is resolved; because Matthew speaks by way of recapitulation, as he shows in that same place.
The second rule is that one omits, another states: and both things were done, but both were not said by both; thus the second is resolved: because she both anointed the feet and then poured the whole over the head.